[Paper] Quantitative Performance Analysis of Stopping Criteria for CMA-ES

Source: arXiv - 2606.09220v1

Overview

Covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES) is a state-of-the-art black-box optimization algorithm. In general, CMA-ES uses a portfolio of multiple stopping criteria to automatically determine when to stop the search. This mechanism aims to avoid unnecessary consumption of the function evaluation budget during stagnation. Stopping criteria play an important role in CMA-ES, particularly when restart strategies are employed. However, the effectiveness of stopping criteria in CMA-ES remains poorly understood. To address this issue, this paper investigates how the 11 stopping criteria in CMA-ES behave on the noiseless BBOB function set. The performance of the stopping criteria is quantitatively evaluated based on the optimal stopping point in terms of the number of function evaluations in a single run of CMA-ES. Our results show that, although which stopping criterion is triggered first depends significantly on the sample size $λ$ and the dimension $n$, \texttt{tolflatfitness} and \texttt{tolfun} are frequently the first criteria to be triggered among the portfolio of 11 stopping criteria. We also demonstrate that \texttt{tolfunhist} and the portfolio achieve the highest stopping accuracy in most cases. In addition, our results show that the \texttt{tolfun} and \texttt{tolfunhist} criteria are frequently triggered before CMA-ES reaches complete stagnation.

Key Contributions

This paper presents research in the following areas:

• cs.NE

Methodology

Please refer to the full paper for detailed methodology.

Practical Implications

This research contributes to the advancement of cs.NE.

Authors

• Ryoji Tanabe

Paper Information

• arXiv ID: 2606.09220v1
• Categories: cs.NE
• Published: June 8, 2026
• PDF: Download PDF