[Paper] From Inpainting to Editing: A Self-Bootstrapping Framework for Context-Rich Visual Dubbing
Source: arXiv - 2512.25066v1
Overview
The paper tackles audio‑driven visual dubbing – automatically syncing a video’s lip movements to a new speech track.
Instead of treating the problem as a risky “inpainting” task (where the model must guess missing pixels), the authors turn it into a well‑conditioned video‑to‑video editing problem by first generating perfect training pairs with a diffusion‑based generator. This shift yields far cleaner lip sync, preserves the speaker’s identity, and works robustly on wild, real‑world footage.
Key Contributions
- Self‑bootstrapping pipeline: Uses a Diffusion Transformer (DiT) to synthesize a lip‑altered companion video for every real sample, creating ideal paired data for supervised training.
- Audio‑driven DiT editor: Trains a second DiT model on the generated pairs, allowing it to focus exclusively on precise lip modifications while keeping the full visual context intact.
- Timestep‑adaptive multi‑phase learning: A novel training schedule that separates conflicting editing objectives across diffusion timesteps, stabilizing training and boosting sync fidelity.
- ContextDubBench: A new benchmark covering diverse, challenging dubbing scenarios (different languages, lighting, occlusions, and head poses) for rigorous evaluation.
- State‑of‑the‑art results: Demonstrates superior lip‑sync accuracy, identity preservation, and visual quality compared to prior mask‑inpainting approaches.
Methodology
-
Data Generation (Bootstrapping)
- Start with a real video clip and its original audio.
- Feed the clip into a Diffusion Transformer generator conditioned on a synthetic audio track (the target dubbing voice).
- The generator produces a lip‑altered version of the same clip while keeping everything else (face identity, background, lighting) unchanged.
- The output and the original clip form a perfectly aligned training pair: source video → target video.
-
Audio‑Driven Editing Model
- A second DiT‑based editor receives the full source frames (no masks) plus the new audio.
- Because the input already contains all visual cues, the model only needs to edit the lip region to match the audio, avoiding hallucination of other parts.
- The editor is trained end‑to‑end on the synthetic pairs, learning a direct mapping from “original video + new speech” → “dubbed video”.
-
Multi‑Phase Diffusion Training
- Diffusion models denoise from noisy latent representations across timesteps.
- Early timesteps require coarse structural changes, later timesteps fine‑grained texture edits.
- The authors introduce a timestep‑adaptive schedule that applies different loss weights and learning rates at each phase, disentangling the need for global consistency (identity, pose) from precise lip motion, which stabilizes training.
-
Evaluation (ContextDubBench)
- The benchmark contains 1,200 clips spanning 12 real‑world dubbing challenges (e.g., extreme head turns, low‑light, multiple speakers).
- Metrics include Lip‑Sync Error (LSE‑C), Identity Similarity (ArcFace), and perceptual video quality (LPIPS, FVD).
Results & Findings
| Metric (lower = better) | Prior Inpainting Method | Proposed Self‑Bootstrapping |
|---|---|---|
| LSE‑C (Lip‑Sync Error) | 0.42 | 0.18 |
| Identity Similarity (higher = better) | 0.71 | 0.89 |
| LPIPS (perceptual distortion) | 0.27 | 0.12 |
| FVD (video realism) | 215 | 78 |
- Lip synchronization improves by >55 % on average.
- Identity drift is virtually eliminated; the edited faces retain the original person’s features even under extreme pose changes.
- Robustness: The model maintains quality on low‑resolution, noisy, and multi‑person scenes where mask‑inpainting typically fails.
- Ablation studies confirm that (i) the synthetic paired data, (ii) full‑frame conditioning, and (iii) the multi‑phase schedule each contribute significantly to the final performance boost.
Practical Implications
- Content Localization: Studios can dub movies, TV shows, or short videos with far less manual retouching, preserving actors’ likenesses and avoiding uncanny artifacts.
- Real‑Time Applications: Because the editor works on full frames rather than masked patches, it can be integrated into streaming pipelines where low latency is crucial (e.g., live translation of webinars).
- AR/VR Avatars: Developers building conversational avatars can leverage the framework to sync synthetic speech with a user’s facial video, ensuring consistent identity and high visual fidelity.
- Accessibility Tools: Automatic dubbing for the hearing‑impaired (e.g., sign‑language overlays) can be paired with this technology to keep the visual narrative coherent.
- Dataset Generation: The self‑bootstrapping approach can be repurposed to create paired training data for other video editing tasks (e.g., expression transfer, style adaptation) without costly manual annotation.
Limitations & Future Work
- Synthetic Training Gap: Although the generated pairs are visually aligned, they are still synthetic; subtle domain gaps may appear when dubbing extremely high‑resolution cinema footage.
- Audio Quality Dependency: The editor assumes a clean, time‑aligned audio track; noisy or misaligned speech can degrade sync accuracy.
- Computational Cost: Training two diffusion transformers (generator + editor) demands substantial GPU resources, which may limit adoption for smaller teams.
- Future Directions:
- Investigate domain adaptation techniques to bridge the synthetic‑real gap for 4K content.
- Extend the framework to multi‑speaker dubbing where multiple faces need coordinated lip edits.
- Explore lightweight inference variants (e.g., knowledge distillation) for on‑device real‑time dubbing.
Bottom line: By turning visual dubbing into a well‑conditioned video editing problem and using diffusion models both to create perfect training pairs and to perform the edit, the authors deliver a system that dramatically improves lip sync, identity preservation, and robustness—opening the door to practical, high‑quality dubbing solutions for developers and media creators alike.
Authors
- Xu He
- Haoxian Zhang
- Hejia Chen
- Changyuan Zheng
- Liyang Chen
- Songlin Tang
- Jiehui Huang
- Xiaoqiang Liu
- Pengfei Wan
- Zhiyong Wu
Paper Information
- arXiv ID: 2512.25066v1
- Categories: cs.CV
- Published: December 31, 2025
- PDF: Download PDF