Will Trump’s DOJ actually take on Ticketmaster?

Source: The Verge

DOJ Antitrust Leadership Turmoil and the Live Nation Case

In mid‑February, the Department of Justice lost its head antitrust enforcer – just weeks before it was scheduled to argue one of the year’s biggest anti‑monopoly cases in court.

Antitrust Division chief Gail Slater announced her departure suddenly via a post on her personal X account. To those who follow the agency closely, it was far from surprising. For months, leaks about the division described tensions between Slater and her team with DOJ leadership, and President Donald Trump’s penchant for personal dealmaking raised questions about who would really call the antitrust shots.

• Over the summer, two of Slater’s top deputies were fired for what the DOJ said was “insubordination.” One of them later described pushing back against a wireless‑networking deal between Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) and Juniper Networks, peddled by “MAGA‑In‑Name‑Only” lobbyists and DOJ officials.
• The week before Slater announced her departure, a third deputy also left the agency.

The timing drew extra scrutiny because Mike Davis, a lobbyist close to Trump who worked on the HPE‑Juniper deal, is also reportedly working for Live Nation. Live Nation did not provide a comment on the reported connection.

“What was happening implicitly before is now explicit,” one former DOJ official, speaking on background to discuss personnel matters, says of Slater’s sudden departure. “A lot of very powerful corporations have figured out that they can just push through fantasy deals and fantasy outcomes in ways that were impossible before, and all they have to do is pay.”

After Slater posted about her departure, Attorney General Pam Bondi thanked her in a statement “for her service to the Antitrust Division which works to protect consumers, promote affordability, and expand economic opportunity.”

“A lot of very powerful corporations have figured out that they can just push through fantasy deals.”

Live Nation‑Ticketmaster Lawsuit

The DOJ and a coalition of ~40 state attorneys general sued Live Nation‑Ticketmaster in May 2024, seeking to break up the company they allege used anticompetitive practices to lock artists and venues into its orbit.

• By allegedly tying together different parts of its business, using exclusionary contracts, and threatening “financial retaliation” to keep new players out of the market, the company is accused of driving up ticket prices for consumers.
• Live Nation responded in a blog post that the lawsuit “ignores everything that is actually responsible for higher ticket prices.”

With jury selection slated to begin on March 2, many wonder if the DOJ will remain on the case. If the agency settles and steps back, at least some of the 40 states that joined the DOJ could — and likely would — continue to push ahead with the litigation.

“We look forward to going to trial on March 2 against Live Nation,” Paula Blizzard, California’s top antitrust enforcer, said at an event the day of Slater’s announcement.

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti also plans to move forward with the states’ lawsuit (reported by Capitol Forum).

Interim Leadership

The DOJ may remain a lead plaintiff. Omeed Assefi, who is taking over Slater’s role in the interim, pledged to continue her agenda (MLex). As of February 17, he said the case is strong and favors trial (Capitol Forum).

Global Competition Review reported that Assefi encouraged staff to look to his work on criminal antitrust enforcement as a guide for how he’ll lead the division:

“Ask them how I feel about settling cases in lieu of trial. Ask them how I feel about accepting half measures and mere monetary penalties in lieu of seeking justice.”

State Perspective

Slater was known as a serious enforcer of antitrust law — and reports suggest her agenda was overruled.

“The states are no stranger to real politik.”

In general, states are always prepared for changes in their trial partners, says Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley, former Wisconsin antitrust chief and chair of the National Association of Attorneys General Multistate Antitrust Task Force. (Cooley agreed to speak generally about the role of state enforcement and not about the Live Nation case in particular, which Wisconsin was part of during her time there.)

“The states are no stranger to real politik,” Cooley says. State enforcers understand that priorities and personnel can change with administrations, either in state offices or at the DOJ. This can require changes, like reassigning the most seasoned lawyers to fill gaps left by federal attorneys. But Cooley says there are plenty of experienced litigators in the states. “My understanding from talking with states generally is that this is something they were prepared for, and so …”

“States should be able to take this in stride,” Cooley adds.

The T‑Mobile‑Sprint merger litigation may serve as a guide. After Trump’s DOJ approved the merger, some states settled their cases, while others continued a fight to block it. In the end, a court let the merger close anyway.

States could be more aggressive in pursuing the Live Nation‑Ticketmaster trial. The company has been widely criticized by musicians and concertgoers alike, especially after infamously bungling a Taylor Swift ticket presale in 2022. In an interview with Bloomberg, attorneys general for California and Connecticut said they’d maintain a high bar for settling:

“Any resolution that is politically motivated or impacted, or any settlement that comes from trying to placate the president or meet his demands is not likely to fly with Connecticut or California either,” — Connecticut AG William Tong

Citizen complaints about Ticketmaster are among the top 10 issues state AGs commonly hear about, according to Cooley. “That’s something that the state AGs are going to be really paying attention to.”

---

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

• Lauren Feiner
• (additional authors can be listed here)