Why Your ChatGPT Images Fail?
Source: Dev.to
Overview
ChatGPT reached 900 million weekly active users in December 2025—three times its December 2024 count. Yet only about 7 % of those queries involve multimedia such as images. The gap between user demand and image quality is growing, and many prompts that worked in 2023 now produce disappointing results.
Why Images Fail
- Outdated prompting style – The old “just type what you want” approach no longer aligns with the newer model’s expectations.
- Stricter realism and safety controls – Vague prompts are now answered with a safe, generic style that looks obviously AI‑generated.
- Lighting and texture defaults – If you don’t specify a lens, lighting, or camera settings, the engine picks bland defaults, resulting in flat images.
Changes in the December 2025 Model
- Higher realism focus – The model simulates real camera lenses and lighting conditions.
- Enhanced safety filters – Prompts that hint at copyrighted styles or specific artists are more likely to be blocked.
- Generic fallback – When the prompt is ambiguous, the system defaults to a “super safe” aesthetic rather than guessing.
Prompting Tips
- Be explicit about visual parameters
- Lens: “shot with a 50 mm f/1.8 lens”
- Lighting: “golden hour backlight” or “soft diffused studio lighting”
- Describe style without naming artists
- ✅ “oil painting with heavy brushstrokes”
- ❌ “in the style of Van Gogh” (may trigger safety filter)
- Treat the prompt like a director’s brief
- Include composition, perspective, mood, and color palette.
Example Prompt
A futuristic city skyline at sunset, shot with a 24 mm wide‑angle lens, neon reflections on glass, soft ambient lighting, hyper‑realistic, oil painting texture with heavy brushstrokes, cinematic color grading.
Safety Filters & Copyright
- The Safety Filter now blocks prompts that could unintentionally replicate a protected style, even if the request is vague.
- To avoid blocks, focus on descriptive adjectives and technical details rather than brand or artist names.
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| “Cool dragon” | Too generic; defaults to cartoonish style | Specify “realistic dragon, detailed scales, dramatic side lighting, 85 mm portrait lens” |
| Conversational tone (“Hey, can you…”) | Model expects concise, directive prompts | Start directly with the visual description |
| Omitting lighting or lens info | Results in flat, generic images | Add explicit lighting and lens specifications |
Next Steps
- Review the full guide for step‑by‑step instructions, visual examples, and advanced techniques.
- Experiment with the new parameters to see how small changes affect the output.