Weaviate for RAG: When It Shines (and When It Doesn’t)
Source: Dev.to
Overview
A hands‑on review after building an enterprise‑grade PoC — not just another “Hello World”.
As a Technical Lead & AI Architect (Hands‑On) focused on Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, I’ve built solutions for organizations such as HSBC, Scotiabank, and CFE. Recently, at AI Research Lab in Mexico City (Feb 2025 – Jun 2025), I led the architecture for a comprehensive RAG solution for an internal Business Intelligence Engine PoC. This effort was a technical deep‑dive to validate architecture, latency, and security patterns for future enterprise deployment.
The PoC was designed to rigorously test RAG architectures for real‑world readiness, incorporating:
- Full enterprise patterns (auth, error handling, observability)
- Local LLMs (DeepSeek‑R1 via Ollama)
- 100 % data sovereignty
- Benchmarks on real hardware (GCP n2‑standard‑8)
My contributions included:
- Designing a multi‑layered RAG architecture with reactive streaming patterns (Spring WebFlux, Project Reactor)
- Architecting Weaviate v4 integration with optimized Sentence‑BERT embeddings for financial document processing
- Directing the local LLM integration strategy
🔗 Full architecture details:
💻 Code (MIT, non‑commercial):
Where Weaviate Delivers Value — in practice
Hybrid Search: nearText + where = Fewer False Positives
In real use, users don’t ask clean questions like “summarize Q3 earnings”. They often phrase queries such as:
“What did the compliance team say about loan approvals last quarter?”
Most vector databases force a choice between semantic or keyword search. Weaviate’s ability to combine both significantly reduces false positives.
{
Get {
FinancialDocument(
nearText: { concepts: ["loan approval"] }
where: {
path: ["department"]
operator: Equal
valueString: "compliance"
}
) {
title
snippet
_additional { distance }
}
}
}