TrueFoundry vs Bifrost: Why We Chose Specialization Over an All-in-One MLOps Platform

Published: (December 18, 2025 at 02:48 PM EST)
3 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

The Platform Tax

You’ve seen this pattern before:

What you needWhat you getWhat you actually useWhat you pay for
A reliable way to route requests to OpenAI / Anthropic / Bedrock“Here’s a complete MLOps platform that also includes an AI gateway, model training, fine‑tuning, Kubernetes orchestration, GPU management, agent deployment…”The gatewayEverything else

This is the platform tax, and for AI gateways it’s steep.

TrueFoundry – A Kubernetes‑native MLOps platform

TrueFoundry does a lot:

  • Model training infrastructure
  • Fine‑tuning workflows
  • GPU provisioning & scaling
  • Model deployment orchestration
  • AI gateway (one component among many)
  • Agent orchestration
  • Full Kubernetes cluster management

When does TrueFoundry make sense?

  • If you need all of the above – training, fine‑tuning, deployment, gateway, etc.
  • If you already run Kubernetes and have a dedicated DevOps team.

When does it become a tax?

  • If you only need a gateway – you’re paying for a full platform you don’t use.

Typical onboarding timeline (TrueFoundry)

DayActivity
Day 1Provision Kubernetes cluster (EKS / GKE / AKS)
Day 2Install TrueFoundry platform components
Day 3Configure networking, security, RBAC
Day 4Deploy the gateway component
Day 5Configure provider integrations
Day 6Test & debug platform issues
Week 2Actually use the gateway

Bifrost – A lightweight AI gateway

docker run -p 8080:8080 \
  -e OPENAI_API_KEY=your-key \
  -e ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-key \
  maximhq/bifrost

Done. Production‑ready in ~60 seconds.

Visit → Add keys → Start routing.

  • No Kubernetes. No platform. No DevOps team required.

Performance & cost highlights

MetricTrueFoundry (platform)Bifrost (gateway)
Latency overheadVariable, depends on platform loadTrueFoundry does not have semantic caching.

Intelligent Failover

# OpenAI rate limit hit
# Bifrost automatically routes to Anthropic
# User sees zero downtime
# **You don’t need Kubernetes.** That’s the point.

Migration: TrueFoundry gateway → Bifrost

WeekActivity
Week 1 – Parallel DeploymentDeploy Bifrost alongside TrueFoundry; configure identical providers; test with 10 % traffic.
Week 2 – Traffic ShiftGradually shift traffic: 10 % → 50 % → 100 %; monitor performance; keep TrueFoundry as fallback.
Week 3 – Full CutoverRoute all traffic through Bifrost; decommission TrueFoundry gateway; celebrate ≈ 40 % cost savings.

Most teams complete migration in 2‑3 weeks.

Bottom line

  • TrueFoundry = full‑stack MLOps platform (great if you need the whole stack).
  • Bifrost = lightweight, OpenAI‑compatible gateway (ideal for the majority of teams).

Pick the tool that matches the problem you actually need to solve.

Why It Matters

1. Specialization Wins

Purpose‑built tools outperform platform components. Every time.

2. Performance Matters

  • Most teams don’t need a full MLOps platform.

They need a reliable way to access multiple LLM providers without the operational overhead. That’s why we built Bifrost.

Get Started

Self‑hosted (free, open source)

docker run -p 8080:8080 maximhq/bifrost

Managed Cloud

Sign up for free

Resources

  • GitHub – ⭐ Star it!
  • Documentation
  • Benchmarks

Questions?

Drop a comment below. I’m happy to chat about:

  • Gateway architecture
  • Performance optimization
  • Why we chose Go over Python

P.S. If you’re building a full ML platform from scratch and need training + deployment + gateway, TrueFoundry is solid. This isn’t a hit piece—it’s about choosing the right tool for the job.

But if you just need a gateway? Save yourself weeks of Kubernetes headaches and use a specialized tool.

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »