REST vs. GraphQL: Choosing the Right API Architecture

Source: Dev.to

Understanding REST: The Established Standard

REST, short for Representational State Transfer, is an architectural style that leverages the principles of the World Wide Web. It’s not a protocol but a set of constraints that, when followed, lead to well‑behaved, scalable, and maintainable distributed systems. The core idea behind REST is to treat every resource (e.g., a user, a product, an order) as an entity that can be identified by a unique URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) and manipulated using standard HTTP methods.

Key Principles of REST

• Client‑Server Architecture:
  The client and server are independent, allowing them to evolve separately as long as the interface between them remains the same.

• Statelessness:
  Each request from a client to the server must contain all the information necessary to understand and fulfill the request. The server should not store any client context between requests.

• Cacheability:
  Responses from the server should indicate whether they are cacheable. This allows clients to reuse responses for subsequent requests, improving performance.

• Layered System:
  A client cannot ordinarily tell whether it is connected directly to the end server or to an intermediary along the way.

• Uniform Interface: (the most critical constraint)

  • Identification of Resources: Resources are identified in requests using URIs.
  • Manipulation of Resources Through Representations: Clients receive representations of resources (e.g., JSON, XML) and can manipulate them by sending those representations back to the server.
  • Self‑descriptive Messages: Each message includes enough information to describe how to process it.
  • Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State (HATEOAS): Clients should be able to discover available actions and navigate the API through links provided in the responses. While powerful, HATEOAS is often the least implemented aspect of REST.

REST in Practice: Examples

Imagine we’re building an e‑commerce application. We might have the following RESTful endpoints:

Get all products
GET /api/v1/products

[
  {
    "id": 1,
    "name": "Laptop",
    "price": 1200.00
  },
  {
    "id": 2,
    "name": "Keyboard",
    "price": 75.00
  }
]

Get a specific product
GET /api/v1/products/1

{
  "id": 1,
  "name": "Laptop",
  "price": 1200.00,
  "description": "Powerful and lightweight laptop."
}

Create a new product
POST /api/v1/products

{
  "name": "Mouse",
  "price": 25.00
}

Update a product
PUT /api/v1/products/2

{
  "price": 80.00
}

Delete a product
DELETE /api/v1/products/2

REST’s Strengths

• Simplicity and Familiarity: REST is widely understood and adopted. Developers are generally comfortable with HTTP methods and status codes.
• Scalability: Its stateless nature makes it highly scalable.
• Cacheability: Built‑in HTTP caching mechanisms can significantly improve performance.
• Resource‑Oriented: The clear mapping of resources to URIs makes the API structure intuitive.

REST’s Weaknesses

• Over‑fetching and Under‑fetching: Clients often receive more data than they need (over‑fetching) or have to make multiple requests to get all the required data (under‑fetching).
• Endpoint Proliferation: As applications grow, the number of endpoints can become unmanageable.
• Versioning Challenges: Managing API versions can be complex.

---

Introducing GraphQL: A Query Language for APIs

GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for executing those queries with your existing data. Developed by Facebook, it provides a more efficient, powerful, and flexible alternative to REST. Unlike REST, where the server defines the API endpoints and the data returned, GraphQL allows the client to specify exactly what data it needs.

Key Principles of GraphQL

• Ask for What You Need, Get Exactly That:
  Clients send queries to the server specifying the exact fields they require, eliminating over‑fetching.

• Single Endpoint:
  Typically, GraphQL APIs expose a single endpoint (e.g., /graphql) where all requests are sent.

• Strongly Typed Schema:
  GraphQL APIs are defined by a schema, which is a blueprint of the data that can be queried. The schema defines the types of data, their fields, and the relationships between them.

• Hierarchical Data Fetching:
  Queries are structured hierarchically, mirroring the structure of the data being requested.

• Mutations and Subscriptions:
  Mutations allow clients to modify data, while subscriptions enable real‑time updates.

GraphQL in Practice: Examples

Using our e‑commerce example, a GraphQL API would typically have a single endpoint. The client sends a query that defines exactly the data it needs.

Query for product names and prices

query {
  products {
    name
    price
  }
}

Response (JSON)

{
  "data": {
    "products": [
      {
        "name": "Laptop",
        "price": 1200.00
      },
      {
        "name": "Keyboard",
        "price": 75.00
      }
    ]
  }
}

Notice how we only received the name and price fields, avoiding over‑fetching.

Query for a specific product’s name, description, and its seller’s name

Assume there’s a seller field on the Product type.

query {
  product(id: "1") {
    name
    description
    seller {
      name
    }
  }
}

Response (JSON)

{
  "data": {
    "product": {
      "name": "Laptop",
      "description": "Powerful and lightweight laptop.",
      "seller": {
        "name": "Tech Gadgets Inc."
      }
    }
  }
}

This query fetches related data (the seller’s name) in a single round‑trip, solving the under‑fetching problem of REST.

Mutation to create a new product

mutation {
  createProduct(input: { name: "Mouse", price: 25.00 }) {
    id
    name
  }
}

Response (JSON)

{
  "data": {
    "createProduct": {
      "id": "3",
      "name": "Mouse"
    }
  }
}

GraphQL’s Strengths

• Efficient Data Fetching – Solves over‑fetching and under‑fetching by letting clients request precisely the data they need.
• Improved Performance – Fewer network requests can lead to a faster user experience, especially on mobile devices.
• Strongly Typed Schema – Provides a clear contract between client and server, enabling better tooling, autocompletion, and validation.
• Flexibility for Clients – Empowers frontend developers to evolve their data needs without requiring backend API changes for every minor adjustment.
• Easier API Evolution – New fields can be added to the schema without breaking existing clients.

GraphQL’s Weaknesses

• Complexity – Steeper learning curve compared to REST, especially for those new to query languages and schema definitions.
• Caching – Client‑side caching can be more complex than HTTP caching in REST; server‑side caching also requires careful strategy.
• Rate Limiting & Security – Implementing granular rate limiting and security measures is trickier due to the single endpoint and flexible queries.
• Tooling Maturity – While improving rapidly, some tooling aspects are not yet as mature as the well‑established REST ecosystem.

---

When to Choose Which

The decision between REST and GraphQL hinges on your project’s specific requirements, team expertise, and anticipated growth.

Choose REST when

• You are building a simple API with a fixed set of resources and predictable data requirements.
• Your team is already highly proficient with REST principles and tools.
• Leveraging existing HTTP caching mechanisms is a high priority.
• You have a small‑to‑medium‑sized application where over‑fetching and under‑fetching are not significant concerns.
• You need to integrate with existing systems that heavily rely on RESTful conventions.

Choose GraphQL when

• Your application has complex data requirements and relationships between resources.
• You need to optimise network performance, especially for mobile clients or apps with diverse data needs.
• You want to empower frontend developers to iterate quickly on UI and data fetching without constant backend involvement.
• You anticipate frequent changes in data requirements or have a microservices architecture where clients need to aggregate data from multiple sources.
• You value a strongly typed API contract and the tooling that comes with it.

---

Conclusion

Both REST and GraphQL are powerful architectural styles for building APIs, each with its own strengths and weaknesses.

• REST remains a robust, widely adopted standard—ideal for simpler APIs and for leveraging HTTP’s built‑in features.
• GraphQL offers a modern, flexible, and efficient approach—especially suited for complex applications where precise data fetching and performance optimisation are critical.

By understanding the fundamental differences and considering your project’s unique context, you can make an informed decision that sets your API architecture up for success, ensuring efficient data exchange and a positive developer experience.