Maps are easy. Map UIs are not.

Published: (January 6, 2026 at 02:04 PM EST)
2 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

The Problem with Map UIs

Most map libraries solve rendering, but very few solve product UI.
I’ve used maps in dashboards, tools, and internal products — and every time, the pain wasn’t the map itself. It was everything around it:

  • Markers that don’t match the design system
  • Side panels that feel hacked together
  • Filters, overlays, legends, states — all custom every time
  • Styling conflicts between the map and UI components

The result? You rebuild the same map UI patterns again and again.

Why Existing Map Libraries Fall Short

The problem isn’t Leaflet, Mapbox, or Google Maps—they do their job well.
The issue is that they stop at “map primitives,” while real products need opinionated UI composition.

Introducing EasyMaps

After repeating this cycle a few times, I stopped rewriting the same code and started building a small, composable UI kit for maps — in the same spirit as shadcn/ui, but focused on map‑heavy products.

Goals

  • Predictable map UIs
  • Design‑system friendly components
  • Fast to assemble
  • Less painful to maintain

It’s still early, but the experience already feels different — more like assembling a product, less like fighting CSS and state.

Who Might Benefit

If you’ve built dashboards, logistics tools, real‑estate apps, or anything where maps are core, you probably know this pain.

Get Started

I’m calling it EasyMaps.

👉

Would love to hear how others are handling map UI complexity today.

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »

Zig vs Go: init and run

Initialization In Go we initialize a module with: bash go mod init module-name In Zig the equivalent is simply: bash zig init Zig does not require explicit “mo...

Day 1 of Learning Linux & GitHub 🚀

markdown !Forem Logohttps://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=65,height=,fit=scale-down,gravity=auto,format=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2...