Designing a Lightweight Data Pipeline for Analysis Without Stressing Production Databases

Published: (December 22, 2025 at 10:05 AM EST)
4 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Overview

In many systems, analytics begin as a convenience query against the production database. Over time, these queries grow heavier, scan larger time ranges, and slowly degrade system reliability.

This post describes a lightweight, production‑safe data pipeline for analytical workloads, built with:

  • Delta Lake on S3 – durable analytical storage
  • DuckDB – embedded analytics engine
  • Tenant‑isolated batch processing
  • Strict resource limits
  • Local caching – reduces cloud I/O

Note: This is not a streaming system and not an anomaly engine yet. It is a clean analytical data pipeline designed to protect production databases.

Why Not Run Analytics on Production Databases?

Production databases are optimized for:

  • Fast point reads
  • High write concurrency
  • Transactional guarantees

They are not optimized for:

  • Large historical scans
  • Aggregations over months or years
  • Repeated analytical jobs
  • Heavy read amplification

Running analytics on production systems leads to:

  • Query latency spikes
  • Lock contention
  • CPU starvation
  • Unpredictable failures during peak hours

Primary Architectural Goal

Never run analytical queries on the production database.

The pipeline is built on four non‑negotiable principles:

  1. Production isolation – analytics never touch OLTP systems
  2. Batch‑first design – no streaming complexity
  3. Bounded resources – strict memory and thread limits
  4. Operational simplicity – no clusters to manage

Core Components

DuckDB

  • Runs inside the application process, not as a service
  • Embedded OLAP engine (no JVM, no cluster, no coordinator)
  • Excels at columnar scans, vectorized execution, and high‑throughput Parquet/Delta reads

Configuration (hard limits)

SET memory_limit = '1GB';          -- per environment
SET threads = 2;                  -- based on available CPU cores
SET enable_object_cache = true;

These settings guarantee no memory explosions and predictable performance. Each analytical run behaves like a bounded task, not a long‑running service.

Delta Lake on Amazon S3

  • Provides ACID transactions on object storage, schema enforcement, safe concurrent writes, and time‑travel for reprocessing
  • S3 offers low‑cost, highly durable storage

Together they create a stable analytical backbone fully decoupled from production systems.

Data Layout & Tenant Isolation

s3://data-lake/
└─ tenant_id=tenant_123/
   └─ energy_reading/
      └─ year=2025/
         └─ month=03/

Benefits

  • Partition pruning
  • Reduced S3 reads
  • Strong tenant isolation
  • Linear horizontal scaling by tenant

Each job processes one tenant at a time.

Why No Streaming Framework?

  • Analytics are not latency‑critical
  • Batch jobs are deterministic
  • Failures are easier to retry
  • Infrastructure cost is dramatically lower

Job Characteristics

  • Run on a scheduler
  • Read bounded time ranges
  • Exit cleanly after execution

Local Disk Cache

  • Stores tenant‑scoped results
  • TTL‑based eviction
  • Eliminates redundant reads

Result: Significantly improves latency, cost efficiency, and overall system stability.

Environment

ComponentSpecification
Instance4 vCPU / 8 GB RAM
DuckDB memory limit1 GB
DuckDB threads2
StorageAmazon S3 (Delta Lake)
CacheLocal disk (result‑level cache)

Performance Metrics

MetricCold Read (S3 + Delta Scan)Warm Read (Local Cache)
Rows scanned~2.1 M0
Rows returned~120 k~120 k
Data read from S3~180 MB0
Query execution time4.8 – 6.2 s40 – 90 ms
Peak memory usage~620 MB~120 MB
CPU utilization~1.5 – 1.8 cores< 0.3 core
Network I/OHigh (S3 reads)None
Production DB load00

Scaling by Number of Tenants

TenantsTotal Processing Time
10~45 s
25~2 min
50~4 min

Observation: No cross‑tenant interference was observed. Each tenant job executed in isolation with predictable, linear scaling characteristics.

Engine Comparison

EngineBest ForStrengthsTrade‑offs / DownsidesOperational Complexity
DuckDB (this approach)Embedded, batch analytics- Runs in‑process
- No cluster management
- Strong S3 + Parquet support
- Predictable resource usage
- Single‑node execution
- Not designed for high concurrent queries
Low
ClickHouseReal‑time analytical services- Extremely fast OLAP queries
- High query concurrency
- Mature production deployments
- Requires dedicated servers
- Stateful storage management
Medium–High
Apache SparkLarge‑scale data processing- Horizontally scalable
- Excellent for ETL & ML
- Rich ecosystem
- Heavy memory footprint
- Slow startup time
- Significant operational complexity
High

Takeaway

For bounded, tenant‑isolated analytical jobs running on a schedule, DuckDB provides the best balance of performance, cost, and operational simplicity.

  • The pipeline solves a very specific problem: running analytical workloads without putting any pressure on production systems.
  • It acts as a production‑safe analytical layer, allowing historical data to be scanned, aggregated, and analyzed in isolation.
  • It also serves as a clean foundation for downstream logic (e.g., anomaly detection, reporting) without forcing those concerns into the storage or query layer.
  • Most importantly, it achieves this without requiring a dedicated analytics cluster, making it a cost‑efficient alternative for teams operating under infrastructure constraints.

Scope Limitations

  • Not a streaming system – no real‑time insights.
  • Not an OLTP replacement.
  • Does not embed anomaly detection logic directly.

The analytical engine focuses purely on reliable, bounded data access—any additional logic can be built on top of this stable foundation.

Anomaly detection or intelligence logic is built on top of it, not baked into it.  
This separation keeps the system easier to reason about, test, and evolve over time.

Not every analytical problem requires a cluster, a streaming framework, or a heavyweight OLAP database.  
In many cases, especially for scheduled or batch‑driven analysis, those tools introduce more operational complexity than value.  
A simpler system — one that is bounded, predictable, and easy to operate — often performs better in practice.

By combining DuckDB with Delta Lake on S3, this pipeline behaves like an analytical sidecar: it stays out of the way of production workloads while still delivering fast, reliable analysis when needed.

The key takeaway is not about the tools themselves, but about architectural restraint.  
Choosing the simplest system that meets your requirements often leads to more stable, maintainable, and cost‑effective outcomes.
Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »