9个最佳Claude Prompt 模板（开发者专用，省Token每日包）

Source: Dev.to

（请提供需要翻译的正文内容，我将为您翻译成简体中文并保持原有的格式。）

如何使用 Claude 节省 Token（快速规则）

一次提示 = 一个功能（避免 “以及…以及…”）

• 请求 PATCHES / diffs，而不是完整文件
• 使用 阶段：先计划 → 再编码 → 最后审查
• 只粘贴重要内容：最多 3–8 个文件，或小片段

1) 每日“一键构建功能”快速方案（使用最广）

当你希望 Claude 端到端实现一个功能且来回交流最少时使用。

You are a senior full-stack engineer.

Project: [name + stack]
Goal: Implement feature: [feature name]

Context (only what matters):
- Tech: [frameworks/libs]
- Relevant files: [list 3–8 file paths]
- Current behavior: [1–2 sentences]
- Expected behavior: [1–2 sentences]
- Constraints: [performance, RTL, no deps, etc.]

Task:
1) Propose the simplest plan (5–8 steps).
2) Produce code as PATCHES grouped by file:
   - File: path/to/file
   - Patch: only changed/added lines (no full file unless necessary)
3) Provide a short manual test checklist.

Output rules:
- No long explanations
- Ask at most 2 questions ONLY if blocking
- Prefer minimal diffs over rewrites

2) “先规划，后停止”（大工程的令牌节省器）

在大型功能之前使用，以避免在错误方向上浪费令牌生成代码。

Act as a senior engineer.

I want to implement: [feature]
Stack: [stack]

First: produce ONLY
1) Architecture / approach
2) File list (new/changed)
3) Data flow
4) Edge cases
5) Risks

STOP after planning and ask: "Continue to patches?"
Rules: no code in this phase.

3) 一次性调试（无无尽对话）

强制 Claude 对可能原因进行排序，并给出最快的确认测试。

You are a senior debugger. Solve in one pass.

Problem:
- Error: [paste error]
- Where: [route/action/job]
- When: [steps to reproduce]
- Expected: [1 sentence]
- What I tried: [bullets]

Relevant code (smallest snippet + file path):
[paste]

Logs (only last relevant lines):
[paste]

Deliver:
1) Root cause (1–2 sentences)
2) Minimal fix as patches by file
3) Why it works (max 5 bullets)
4) Fast verification steps (max 5)

Rules:
- Do not ask for more info unless absolutely required
- If multiple causes, rank them + give a quick test for each

4) 使用 Guardrails 重构（小幅安全差异）

在文件杂乱但又不能冒险破坏行为时使用。

You are a senior engineer. Refactor with minimal risk.

Target:
- File/module: [path]
- Objective: [readability/performance/structure]
- Non-goals: [do NOT change behavior, public API, output HTML, etc.]

Constraints:
- Keep diff small
- No new dependencies
- Maintain existing function signatures

Deliver:
1) Refactor plan (max 6 steps)
2) Patch per file (only changed lines)
3) Verification checklist

5) 代码审查（严格 + 可操作）

获取有意义的审查输出 + 小幅修复，而不是倾倒整个仓库。

Act as a strict code reviewer.

Context:
- Stack: [stack]
- Code style goals: [simplicity, performance, readability]
- Constraints: [no new deps, etc.]

Review these files/snippets:
[Paste or list file + snippet]

Deliver:
- Top issues ranked by severity (max 10)
- Minimal patches for top 3 issues
- Optional improvements (max 5)

Rules: no long explanations.

6) “仅生成脚手架”（当你暂时不想要完整代码时）

在可能需要重写实现时，避免大量 token 消耗的完美方案。

You are generating scaffolding only.

Project: [name]
Feature: [name]

Deliver ONLY:
1) Folder/file structure
2) Interfaces/contracts
3) Controller/service skeletons
4) TODO markers (clear next steps)

Rules:
- No full implementations
- Each file max ~60 lines
- Output per file

7) 实现 UI 组件包（Design → Components）

将设计转换为一致的 UI 构建块。

Act as a UI engineer.

Goal: Build a reusable component pack for:
- [buttons, inputs, cards, modals, alerts...]

Design requirements:
[paste]

Constraints:
- Accessibility required (ARIA/keyboard)
- Mobile‑first
- RTL‑ready if needed
- Keep it framework‑native (no heavy libs)

Deliver:
1) Component list + props
2) File outputs per component
3) Usage examples (short)

Rules: avoid repeated code blocks.

8) “分阶段工作”（阻止 Claude 产生大量输出）

在需要 Claude 产生受控输出时使用。

9) 将需求转化为实现清单（不写代码）

在消耗代码生成代币之前先弄清楚细节。

1. 粘贴高层需求。
2. Claude 返回一份详细的实现清单，内容包括：
   • 必需的文件/模块
   • 数据模型和 API
   • 边界情况和校验规则
   • 测试策略（单元、集成、端到端）
   • 性能或安全性考虑

使用此清单决定是否继续编码或调整范围。