When Governance Depends on the System, It Is No Longer Governance

Published: (January 6, 2026 at 09:29 PM EST)
1 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Governance and System Dependency

In many AI and cybersecurity approaches, governance is gradually embedded into the technical system itself: encoded rules, automated controls, mechanisms that “decide” what is allowed and what is not.

This may appear efficient, but it introduces a structural flaw:

Authority shifts from people and institutions to technology.

Governance cannot depend on a system functioning correctly.
It must exist before, above, and independent of any technical component.

When a system fails, degrades, or is replaced, the legitimacy of decisions cannot disappear with it.
If authority collapses alongside technology, the issue is not a technical failure — it is a governance design failure.

For this reason, in complex and high‑risk environments, governance is not conceived as a function of the system, but as an independent structural property, capable of sustaining accountability and control even as technology changes.

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »

Rapg: TUI-based Secret Manager

We've all been there. You join a new project, and the first thing you hear is: > 'Check the pinned message in Slack for the .env file.' Or you have several .env...

Technology is an Enabler, not a Saviour

Why clarity of thinking matters more than the tools you use Technology is often treated as a magic switch—flip it on, and everything improves. New software, pl...