Supreme Court blocks Trump's emergency tariffs, billions in refunds may be owed
Published: (February 20, 2026 at 10:37 AM EST)
2 min read
Source: Ars Technica
Source: Ars Technica
Ruling and legal reasoning
- The Court, in a 6‑3 decision, remanded the cases to lower courts, concluding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the President power to impose tariffs.
- Chief Justice John Roberts authored the opinion, joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
- The opinion states that only Congress has the power of the purse, and any exceptions are “bound by explicit terms and subject to strict limits.”
- Roberts wrote that the government’s reading of IEEPA to allow the President to unilaterally impose “unlimited amount and duration” tariffs would represent a “transformative expansion of the President’s authority over tariff policy.” He noted that in IEEPA’s half‑century of existence, no President has invoked the statute to impose tariffs of this magnitude.
- The Supreme Court ruled Friday that former President Donald Trump was not authorized to implement emergency tariffs intended to block illegal drug flows and offset trade deficits.
Potential financial impact
- Analysts had previously suggested that the ruling could force the government to issue refunds of up to $1 billion Ars Technica.
- A newer estimate from economists, reported by Reuters, projects that more than $175 billion could be “at risk of having to be refunded.” Reuters article.
This story is breaking and will be updated.