šŸŽ° Stop Gambling with Vibe Coding: Meet Quint

Published: (December 17, 2025 at 04:20 PM EST)
3 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Let’s be real for a second. Prompting Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT feels amazing… until it doesn’t.

You know the cycle:

  • You type a vague prompt like ā€œMake me an auth system.ā€
  • The AI spits out 200 lines of beautiful‑looking TypeScript.
  • You get that dopamine hit. ā€œI am a 10x engineer!ā€
  • You run it.
  • ERROR: undefined is not a function.
  • You spend the next 4 hours debugging code you didn’t write and barely understand.

That’s not engineering. That’s a slot machine with syntax highlighting.

The Problem: AI (and most of us frequently) Has No ā€œChillā€

Vibe coding is chaotic because LLMs are people‑pleasers. They want to give you code now, regardless of whether it actually makes sense architecturally. They lack a thinking framework and don’t check invariants. They just… vibe.

What if you could force the AI to actually think before it types?

Enter Quint šŸ› ļø

Quint is a tiny, no‑nonsense toolkit for AI‑assisted engineering.

  • Not a new IDE.
  • Not a bloated SaaS wrapper.
  • A set of CLI commands (currently) that act as a ā€œThinking OSā€ for your AI‑tool collaboration, making both of you more rigorous.

Whether you use Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, or Codex, Quint sits in the middle and says:

ā€œHey AI, before you write that function, prove to me it won’t break the build.ā€

Why You Should Care (Right Now)

  • The current version is command‑set only. No UI, no heavy dependencies, almost zero overhead for Claude Code or Cursor.
  • In real scenarios—tackling highly complex engineering and even marketing tasks—the difference in result quality is wild.
  • Instead of getting ā€œplausible spaghetti,ā€ you get decision records that respect goals and are linked with evidence.

It just makes sense.

What’s Under the Hood? 🧠

The latest version of Quint Code implements about 10 % of the First Principles Framework (FPF) – an original, formal, and complex specification of the ā€œthinking OSā€ created by Anatoly Levenchuk.

Why release only 10 %?
Because that 10 % is the Pareto Principle in action. You don’t need a PhD in formal logic to improve AI + human collaborative reasoning. You just need to force the AI to acknowledge a few invariants and reasoning chains, acting as an external transformer—like an oracle or overseer.

Even this minimal implementation makes AI agents plan decisions and follow‑up work far better than heuristic planners and to‑dos.

šŸ”® The Near Future: v4.0.0 & the MCP Hype Train

We’re close to dropping v4.0.0, and it’s going to be a banger.

  • Introducing a tiny MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server that will handle the FPF kernel and invariants in a local SQLite database + markdown files.
  • Allows Quint to feed the AI persistent context about your project’s ā€œlaws of physics,ā€ rules, and past decisions—mostly automatically.
  • Targeting ~75 % FPF invariants support with this MCP: still small, still focused, but dramatically smarter.

🧪 Try It. Break It. Roast It.

I want feedback from developers who are actually in the trenches using Cursor/Claude Code daily—not just polite praise.

  • Does it fit your flow?
  • Is the README too confusing?
  • Did it save you from a hallucination?
  • Did it help you plan complex tasks better?

Link to Quint Code repo:

Go ahead. Try it out. If it sucks, tell me why. If it fixes your vibe‑coding hangover, spread the word.

Quint is a small tool, but it has a damn big brain energy.

Thanks for reading,
ivan zakutni

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more Ā»