Solved: Anyone else tired of paying for 6 different apps just to run basic store operations?
Source: Dev.to
Executive Summary
TL;DR: Eācommerce businesses often suffer from āapp sprawlā ā multiple disconnected applications that cause integration failures and operational complexity. This article proposes three solutions:
- Glue code with serverless functions for quick fixes.
- Centralized event bus for scalable decoupling.
- āNuclear optionā ā reāevaluate and consolidate the entire tech stack.
āApp sprawlā results from the bestāofābreed approach, creating unreliable pointātoāpoint integrations and multiple points of failure.
A centralized event bus (e.g., AWS SNS/SQS, Google Pub/Sub, Kafka) implements a publishāsubscribe model to decouple services, allowing applications to react to events without direct integration.
Reāevaluating the entire stackāpotentially consolidating into an allāināone platform or even a monolithācan reduce operational overhead and integration headaches for smallātoāmedium businesses.
Why āApp Sprawlā Happens
- Youāre paying for multiple apps that donāt talk to each other.
- A Senior DevOps Engineer explains why this happens and offers three practical solutions, from quick scripting fixes to longāterm architectural sanity.
I remember a 2āÆAM PagerDuty alert like it was yesterday. The site was up, the databases were fine, but our sales team was panicking because a flash sale had just kicked off and our inventory system wasnāt syncing with our storefront. Turns out, the thirdāparty connector app we paid $150āÆa month for decided to silently fail its authentication token refresh. We were overselling products we didnāt have.
That night, while debugging a glorified webhook between two SaaS platforms, I thought, āWeāre paying thousands for this complexity. There has to be a better way.ā
The Root Cause
The āAPIāfirstā and ābestāofābreedā revolution sold us a dream:
Pick the absolute best tool for every single job.
- Best emailāmarketing app
- Best customerāsupport desk
- Best inventory management
- Best shipping logistics
Reality: You become the unpaid, stressedāout system integrator for half a dozen companies whose only shared goal is getting your creditācard number each month. Each connection is a new point of failure, a new security risk, and another subscription to manage.
Pro Tip: Donāt mistake āhas an APIā for āhas a good, reliable, and wellāmaintained integration.ā The devil is always in the detailsārate limits, authentication schemes, and dataāconsistency models.
Three Paths Forward
1ļøā£ QuickāFix: Glue Code with Serverless Functions
This is the āI need this working by morningā solution.
Identify the most critical, unreliable connection and take control of it yourself. Write a small, focused piece of codeāwhat we lovingly call āglue code.ā The best tool for this is a serverless function (AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, Azure Functions) triggered on a schedule.
Example: Python Lambda to Sync Stock Levels
import os
import requests
# Environment variables are your friend!
APP_A_API_KEY = os.getenv('APP_A_API_KEY')
APP_B_API_KEY = os.getenv('APP_B_API_KEY')
def sync_inventory(event, context):
# 1ļøā£ Fetch data from the source of truth
headers_a = {'Authorization': f'Bearer {APP_A_API_KEY}'}
inventory_data = requests.get(
'https://api.appa.com/v2/products/stock',
headers=headers_a
).json()
# 2ļøā£ Transform the data if necessary (they never use the same format)
transformed_payload = [
{
'sku': item['product_sku'],
'quantity': item['stock_on_hand']
}
for item in inventory_data['items']
]
# 3ļøā£ Push the data to the destination
headers_b = {'X-Api-Key': APP_B_API_KEY}
response = requests.post(
'https://api.appb.com/v1/inventory/bulk_update',
headers=headers_b,
json=transformed_payload
)
if response.status_code != 200:
# Basic error handling ā send an alert to Slack or CloudWatch!
print("ERROR: Sync failed!")
return {'status': 'success'}
Schedule: Run everyāÆ5āÆminutes via Amazon EventBridge (or the equivalent in your cloud).
Pros: Cheap, reliable, gives you full control.
Cons: You may end up with many tiny functionsāstill manageable, though.
2ļøā£ Architectural Upgrade: Centralized Event Bus
If youāre tired of playing whackāaāmole with glue code, think like an architect. Pointātoāpoint integrations create a tangled spiderweb. The solution is a central ānervous systemā for your business operationsāan event bus.
- PublishāSubscribe (pub/sub) model
- AppāÆA publishes an event (e.g.,
NEW_ORDER). - Any app that cares (Shipping, Analytics, Accounting) subscribes and reacts.
- AppāÆA publishes an event (e.g.,
This decouples services completely.
Before vs. After
| Before ā The Spaghetti Mess | After ā The Event Bus (Hub & Spoke) |
|---|---|
| Shopify talks to ShipStation | Shopify publishes NEW_ORDER event |
| Shopify talks to Klaviyo | ShipStation subscribes to NEW_ORDER |
| ShipStation talks to Shopify | Klaviyo subscribes to NEW_ORDER |
| QuickBooks talks to Shopify | QuickBooks subscribes to NEW_ORDER |
Benefits
- Scalability: Add new consumers without touching existing producers.
- Reliability: Message queues provide retry, deadāletter handling, and ordering guarantees.
- Observability: Central point to monitor traffic, latency, and failures.
Typical Technologies
| Cloud Provider | Service |
|---|---|
| AWS | SNS + SQS (or EventBridge) |
| GCP | Pub/Sub |
| Azure | Service Bus |
| Selfāhosted | Apache Kafka, NATS, RabbitMQ |
3ļøā£ The āNuclear Optionā ā Stack Consolidation
When runway is limited and the integration debt is overwhelming, consider reāevaluating the entire stack:
- Allāināone platform (e.g., Shopify Plus with builtāin inventory, shipping, and marketing).
- Monolith built ināhouse that owns every domain (only viable for teams with strong engineering capacity).
Pros: Drastically reduces operational overhead, eliminates thirdāparty failure points.
Cons: Large upfront migration effort, potential vendor lockāin, loss of bestāofābreed flexibility.
Choosing the Right Path
| Situation | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|
| Immediate, missionācritical fix | Glue code with serverless functions |
| Growing product suite, need for scalability | Centralized event bus |
| High integration debt, limited runway | Stack consolidation (ānuclear optionā) |
Final Thoughts
- Donāt let āhas an APIā fool you. Evaluate reliability, rate limits, and maintenance.
- Start small. A single Lambda can buy you hours of downtime avoidance.
- Think long term. An event bus pays off as you add more services.
- When the debt becomes unsustainable, consolidate.
By recognizing the root cause of app sprawl and applying the appropriate solutionāwhether itās quick glue code, a robust event bus, or a full stack overhaulāyou can regain control, cut costs, and deliver a smoother experience for both your team and your customers. š
Scaling Your Tech Stack: When to Consolidate
If youāre adding a new CRM system next year, you donāt have to touch any of your existing systems. You just create a new subscriber that listens for the events it cares about. Itās more work to set up initially, but itās how you scale without losing your mind.
Iām going to say something controversial for a cloud architect: sometimes, the best microāservice architecture is a monolith. For many smallātoāmedium businesses, the operational overhead of managing six different bestāofābreed apps is simply not worth the marginal benefit over an 80āÆ% āgood enoughā allāināone platform.
This is the ārip it all outā option.
You sit down and ask the hard questions:
- Do we really need this standalone support desk, or can we get by with the features in our primary eācommerce platform?
- Is the 5āÆ% conversion lift from this fancy emailāmarketing tool worth the integration headaches and the $500/month subscription?
- Could we consolidate three of these apps into one higherātier plan from a single vendor, like ShopifyāÆPlus or BigCommerceāÆEnterprise?
Moving platforms is a painful, expensive process. But sometimes, the cost of that migration is less than the slow, continuous financial and sanity drain of maintaining a Frankensteinās monster of a tech stack. Itās a business decision, not just a technical one, but itās one that engineering needs to have a strong voice in.
Further Reading
š Read the original article on TechResolve.blog
ā Support my work
If this article helped you, you can buy me a coffee: š