Preventable Danger in Plain Sight: Gabriel Jarret Calls for Fire Safety Reform in Southern California Rentals

Source: Dev.to

Southern California’s rental housing market is often viewed as competitive, expensive, and fast‑moving. What receives far less attention is the safety reality facing many renters who live in older apartment buildings. While these properties remain legal and widely occupied, a significant number operate with outdated electrical systems and limited fire protection. For residents, this creates an ongoing risk that is rarely discussed until a serious incident occurs.

Historical Context

Across the region, thousands of multi‑unit apartment buildings were constructed during the post‑war housing boom of the 1940s and 1950s. At the time, electrical usage was modest and building codes reflected the standards of that era. These structures were never designed to support modern electrical demand, nor were they required to include many of the fire‑safety features considered essential today. Despite decades of technological advancement, many of these buildings remain fundamentally unchanged.

Actor and fire‑safety advocate Gabriel Jarret has worked to bring attention to this issue, arguing that the continued use of outdated infrastructure places renters in unnecessary danger. His advocacy highlights how regulatory gaps allow preventable risks to persist across Southern California.

Current Electrical Risks

• Aging Wiring & Panels – Older apartment buildings often rely on original wiring, panels, and circuits that have not been upgraded for decades. These systems were built to power a limited number of lights and appliances, not the high‑consumption devices that are now standard in most homes.
• Insufficient Grounded Outlets – Grounded outlets may be scarce, while outdated outlet types that lack modern safety features remain common.
• Overloaded Circuits – Today’s renters depend on electricity for nearly every aspect of daily life. Air conditioners, heaters, computers, televisions, kitchen appliances, and charging devices frequently operate at the same time. When apartments offer only a few usable outlets, tenants are forced to rely on extension cords and power strips to meet basic needs.

This constant strain places aging circuits under stress they were never designed to handle. Over time, insulation can break down and connections can weaken. When electrical failures occur, they often happen behind walls or inside panels, where fires can ignite and spread before residents are aware of the danger.

Detecting Electrical Fire Hazards

One of the most dangerous aspects of electrical fire hazards is how difficult they are to detect. Wiring deterioration is hidden from view, and early warning signs are often subtle.

• Flickering lights
• Warm outlets
• Frequent breaker trips

These may signal a serious problem, yet they are commonly dismissed as minor inconveniences.

Fire‑Safety Deficiencies

Many older apartment buildings also lack modern fire‑safety features:

• Absent sprinkler systems
• Outdated or missing smoke detectors
• Limited or poorly designed secondary exits

In the event of a fire, these shortcomings can dramatically reduce the time residents have to respond and escape safely.

Regulatory Gaps

• Lack of Mandatory Inspections – Older buildings are rarely subject to mandatory safety inspections. Without regular evaluations, hazards can persist for years without detection, leaving renters unaware of the conditions surrounding them.
• Tenant Restrictions – California’s current regulatory framework offers limited protection for renters facing unsafe conditions. In most cases, tenants are not allowed to hire licensed electricians to inspect or repair electrical systems without the property owner’s approval. Even when renters are willing to pay for inspections themselves, they are often legally prevented from taking action.
• Owner Obligations – Property owners are not required to upgrade electrical or fire‑safety systems unless the building undergoes major renovations or changes ownership. This allows apartments built more than half a century ago to remain occupied without meeting modern safety standards. Disclosure requirements are minimal, and renters are rarely informed about the true condition of a building’s infrastructure.

This imbalance places renters in a vulnerable position. They are expected to live safely in their homes while lacking the authority to address known or suspected hazards.

Cosmetic Renovations vs. Safety Upgrades

In high‑demand rental markets, older apartment buildings are frequently renovated to improve appearance rather than safety. New flooring, updated kitchens, and fresh paint can make units feel modern and well‑maintained. These cosmetic upgrades often justify higher rents and create a sense of confidence for prospective tenants.

However, cosmetic improvements rarely include:

• Rewiring
• Panel upgrades
• Fire‑safety system installations

Electrical infrastructure and emergency exits are expensive to replace and are often left untouched. As a result, renters may assume that a renovated apartment meets modern standards, when in reality, critical safety components remain outdated.

Without mandatory inspections or transparency requirements, tenants have no reliable way to determine whether a building has been truly modernized or simply refreshed on the surface.

Advocacy and Proposed Reforms

Fire‑safety professionals consistently emphasize that prevention is far more effective than responding after tragedy strikes. Proactive measures can identify hazards early and significantly reduce the likelihood of catastrophic events. This preventive approach has been central to the advocacy efforts of Gabriel Jarret, who has called for policies that address risks before lives are lost.

Proposed reforms include:

1. Routine Electrical Inspections – Mandatory, periodic assessments for older multi‑unit residential buildings conducted by licensed professionals to identify unsafe wiring and overloaded circuits.
2. Tenant‑Initiated Inspections – Allow tenants to request inspections or initiate repairs when property owners fail to respond to legitimate safety concerns.
3. Modern Fire‑Safety Requirements – Apply contemporary fire‑safety standards to older buildings, including functional smoke alarms, clearly marked exit routes, and fire‑suppression systems.

Conclusion

The safety challenges posed by outdated electrical and fire‑protection systems in Southern California’s older rental apartments are real and pressing. While the market continues to prioritize aesthetics and rent growth, the underlying infrastructure often remains decades behind current safety standards. Addressing these gaps through mandatory inspections, tenant empowerment, and updated fire‑safety mandates is essential to protect renters and prevent avoidable tragedies.

One o

Cost Concerns

The most common argument against retroactive safety requirements is cost. Electrical upgrades and fire‑safety installations can be expensive, especially for smaller property owners. Without financial support, some landlords may delay improvements or resist new regulations.

Financial Support

To address this concern, Gabriel Jarret has highlighted the importance of state‑backed incentives. Grants, tax credits, and low‑interest loans could help property owners modernize buildings without placing the financial burden entirely on tenants. These programs would:

• Encourage compliance while minimizing rent increases.
• Reduce the risk of displacement for renters.

By pairing stronger regulations with financial assistance, policymakers can promote safety without creating undue hardship for renters or property owners.

Fire Risks in Older Buildings

Fire risks in older apartment buildings continue to increase as infrastructure ages and electrical demand rises. Extreme heat events, heavier appliance use, and deteriorating materials all contribute to heightened danger. Each year that outdated systems remain in place increases the likelihood of failure.

When residential fires occur, investigations often reveal long‑standing hazards that were known but never addressed. These incidents highlight the cost of inaction and the shortcomings of relying on outdated regulations.

Advocacy

Through continued advocacy, Gabriel Jarret has helped bring public attention to these systemic risks. His work reinforces a fundamental principle:

Safe housing should not depend on the age of a building, but on a commitment to protecting the people who live there.

Conclusion

Southern California now faces a clear choice. By modernizing fire‑safety standards, empowering tenants, and supporting responsible property owners, the region can significantly reduce preventable risks. With decisive reform and shared responsibility, safer rental housing can become the norm rather than the exception.