PostgreSQL Sharding: Scaling Relational Databases

Published: (February 4, 2026 at 11:08 PM EST)
2 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Why Shard?

AspectBenefitTrade‑off
ScalabilityLinear growth with added nodesIncreased operational complexity
Query SimplicitySingle‑shard reads are fastCross‑shard joins require orchestration
Data LocalityUsers often access their own shardRe‑balancing data when shards grow unevenly
Fault IsolationOne shard failure ≠ total outageNeed robust monitoring and failover logic

Key Insight: Never pick a shard key based solely on convenience; it must guarantee even data distribution and align with your most common query patterns.

Sharding Strategies

StrategyDescription
Range‑basedRows are divided by a contiguous range of a shard key (e.g., user ID).
Hash‑basedA hash function distributes rows evenly, avoiding hot spots.
Directory‑basedA lookup service maps each key to a specific shard (common in Citus).

Range‑Based Example (PostgreSQL pg_partman)

-- Create a parent table
CREATE TABLE users (
    id BIGINT NOT NULL,
    name TEXT NOT NULL,
    created_at TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY (id)
) PARTITION BY RANGE (id);

-- Create partitions (shards)
CREATE TABLE users_0_9999 PARTITION OF users FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (10000);
CREATE TABLE users_10000_19999 PARTITION OF users FOR VALUES FROM (10000) TO (20000);

Hash‑Based Example (Citus Extension)

-- Enable the Citus extension
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS citus;

-- Create a distributed (sharded) table
SELECT create_distributed_table('users', 'id');

Directory‑Based Configuration (YAML)

sharding:
  enabled: true
  shardKey: "userId"
  shards:
    - name: shardA
      range: "0-2499"
    - name: shardB
      range: "2500-4999"
    - name: shardC
      range: "5000-7499"
    - name: shardD
      range: "7500-9999"

Implementation Steps with Citus

  1. Install Citus

    psql -c "CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS citus;"
  2. Create a Distributed Table

    SELECT create_distributed_table('users', 'id');
  3. Monitor Shard Health

    • Track CPU, latency, and replication lag per node.
    • Use dashboards or Prometheus‑compatible exporters.
  4. Automate Re‑balancing

    • Move hot ranges to new nodes via Citus’s rebalance_table_shards or custom scripts.
  5. Backup per Shard

    • Perform logical backups (pg_dump) per shard to avoid cross‑shard restore complexity.

Pitfalls & Best Practices

  • Shard Key Selection: Must ensure even distribution and align with frequent query predicates.
  • Cross‑Shard Queries: Expect higher latency; design schema to minimize joins across shards.
  • Operational Overhead: More nodes mean more monitoring, patching, and capacity planning.
  • Data Re‑balancing: Plan for automated tools; manual moves can cause downtime.
  • Testing: Validate performance and failure scenarios in a staging environment before production rollout.

Getting Started

  1. Prototype: Deploy a small‑scale sharded cluster on a staging environment using Citus.
  2. Measure: Record query latency, throughput, and node resource utilization.
  3. Iterate: Refine shard key, partition strategy, and monitoring based on observed traffic patterns.

PostgreSQL sharding empowers teams to scale out beyond the limits of a single instance, but it demands disciplined design, vigilant monitoring, and thoughtful operational practices. Start with a clear shard key, prototype a single strategy, and iterate based on real‑world traffic.

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »