I Replaced My Side Project Backend with AI — Here’s What Broke First

Published: (December 24, 2025 at 11:56 AM EST)
2 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Experiment Overview

If you’ve been on the internet for more than five minutes lately, someone has probably told you:

“Bro, AI can write your entire backend now.”

I decided to run a small experiment: Could I replace most of my side‑project backend logic with AI‑generated code and prompts?

Short answer: yes.
Result: oh no.

The Side Project

  • Simple backend (CRUD + auth + notifications)
  • Nothing fancy, just something that worked
  • Stack: REST APIs, database, some business rules that had “grown organically”

The Plan

  1. Use AI to generate controllers, services, and some validation logic.
  2. “Clean it up later” (famous last words).
  3. Move fast, break things — preferably not in production.

Assumptions

  • AI is amazing at writing code.
  • AI is terrible at understanding your assumptions.

Example

Prompt: “Generate an endpoint to send notifications.”
AI response: “Sure, I’ll retry failed notifications infinitely.”

Result: infinite retries, no back‑off, no limits, no circuit breaker. AI assumes:

  • Network calls always recover.
  • External systems are friendly.
  • Rate limits are a suggestion.

Reality disagrees.

Security (Quietly)

Nothing crashed, which made it even scarier. AI happily:

  • Exposed internal IDs.
  • Logged sensitive payloads.
  • Skipped edge‑case auth checks because “it looked redundant”.

The code was clean… invisible.

Lesson learned: If you don’t explicitly say “this is security‑sensitive”, AI treats it like a tutorial.

Business‑Logic Nuance

I asked AI to “validate whether a user is eligible for an action.”

AI:

  • Checked basic conditions.
  • Missed why those conditions existed in the first place.

Humans encode intent in ugly if‑statements and patterns. That difference matters more than I expected.

The Twist

AI excelled at:

  • Boilerplate (DTOs, mappers).
  • Test‑case scaffolding.
  • Explaining my own code back to me.

It didn’t replace me.

Recommendations

If you’re tempted to try this (and you should, at least once):

✅ Use AI for

  • Skeletons.
  • Repetitive logic.
  • Tests.
  • Documentation.

🚫 Don’t blindly trust AI for

  • Auth.
  • Retries.
  • Money‑related logic.
  • Edge cases that exist because of a specific historical incident (e.g., “this edge case only exists because of a 2021 incident”).

Bottom line: AI is a brilliant intern, not your tech lead. My overconfidence broke the backend, not the AI itself. With better prompts and more tests, the outcome could be very different.

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »