I Built Yahoo Pipes 2.0 in 7 Days Using Kiro's Spec-Driven AI Development
Source: Dev.to
The Yahoo Pipes Problem
If you’re a certain age in tech, you remember Yahoo Pipes fondly. It offered:
- Visual programming for data workflows
- No coding required
- Fetch RSS feeds, filter, merge, transform
- Output to anything
Yahoo shut it down in 2015. The dev community mourned. Alternatives (Zapier, IFTTT, n8n) existed but none captured that perfect balance of power and simplicity.
What I Built: GhostPipes
Core Features
🎯 ML‑Powered Recommendations
“The Netflix for pipelines.” Paste a URL, upload CSV, or drop text—Ghost Pipes analyzes:
- Input type (file/URL/text)
- MIME type and structure
- Your usage history
- Pipeline success rates
It scores each pipeline 0‑100 and suggests the top 5, learning from every execution.
🎨 Industrial‑Grade Visual Editor
Not a simple node editor; realistic pipes:
Bad: Node1 -----> Node2
Good: Node1 ═══╗
║
Node2
Features:
- 10 px thick SVG pipes
- 90° bends with smooth cubic‑bezier corners
- Collision avoidance (pipes route around nodes)
- Decorative joint patches at elbows
- 60 fps drag‑and‑drop with
requestAnimationFrame
⚡ 35+ Node Types
Input, processing, and output nodes covering:
- HTTP requests (scheduled or one‑time)
- Webhooks (generate unique URLs)
- File operations (CSV, JSON, HTML parsing)
- AI processing (summarize, translate, extract)
- Logic (loops, conditionals, switches)
- Destinations (download, API POST, email)
🔗 Real‑Time Webhooks
Generate a unique URL for each pipeline. When external services trigger it:
- Backend validates token
- Checks payload size
- Executes the pipeline
Implementation details (excerpt):
If kiro build backend
- [Kiro reads specs + steering]
- [Generates 15 files, 3,500 lines]
- [Tests pass on first run]
- Time: 5 days of implementation
- Quality: Production‑ready immediately
- Maintainability: Fully documented, follows my style
Real Examples of Kiro’s Magic
Example 1: The SVG Pipe Challenge
Problem: “I don’t know SVG. Creating realistic pipes will take weeks.”
Solution:
- Described “industrial pipes, 10 px thick, 90° bends, smooth corners”
- Uploaded a reference image
Kiro generated a complete PathCalculator class:
export class PathCalculator {
calculateOrthogonalPath(start, end, obstacles) {
// 120 lines of collision detection, waypoint generation,
// Bezier curve insertion
}
generateSVGPath(waypoints) {
// Converts to SVG with smooth corners
}
}
Result: Worked perfectly; 200+ lines I never had to write.
Example 2: 35+ Om.js Web Components
Problem: AI trained on React produces garbage for custom frameworks.
Solution: Documented Om.js in /steering/om-js-framework.md (reactive proxy system, html template literals, event binding with @click, no shadow DOM).
Kiro’s Output (FilterNode component):
import { react, html } from '/lib/om.compact.js';
export class FilterNode extends HTMLElement {
state = react({
mode: 'permit',
rules: []
});
render() {
return html`
this.state.mode}>
Permit
Block
${this.state.rules.map(rule => this.renderRule(rule))}
`;
}
}
Perfect Om.js syntax on the first try. Generated 34 more nodes, all flawless.
Example 3: AWS Integration via MCP
Background: Front‑end dev, out of practice with AWS.
Issue: Aurora PostgreSQL migrations failed; database seemed missing.
Kiro + AWS MCP:
Me: "Here’s my Terraform config. Migrations fail. Database 'ghostpipes' doesn't exist."
Kiro: "RDS instance created, but database not initialized. Run:
CREATE DATABASE ghostpipes;
Also, your connection string is missing the DB name. Add: ?database=ghostpipes"
Fixed in 5 minutes.
The Agent Hooks Secret Weapon
Kiro’s hooks continuously monitor code quality.
.kiro/hooks/pre-commit.js
// Check for leaked API keys
if (detectAPIKeys(changedFiles)) {
fail("API key detected in commit!");
}
// Check manifest.json permissions
if (hasNewPermissions(manifest)) {
warn("New permission added: " + newPerms);
}
.kiro/hooks/on-build.js
// Remove console.logs in production
stripDebugCode(distFiles);
// Check bundle size
if (extensionSize > 5 * 1024 * 1024) { // 5 MB
fail("Extension too large: " + extensionSize);
}
These hooks caught 12 issues during development:
- 2 hard‑coded test API keys
- 1 accidental “ permission
- 8 leftover
console.logs - 1 bundle‑size spike (wrong library included)
The Numbers
| Metric | Traditional | With Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Dev Time | 6‑8 weeks | 7 days |
| Lines of Code | ~8,000 | ~8,000 |
| Rewrites | 3‑4 major | 0 |
| Documentation | Written after | Written before |
| Test Coverage | ~60 % | ~85 % |
| Bugs in Production | 15‑20 | 3 |
What I Learned
1. Specs Are Worth It
Spending 2 days on specs felt slow, but the clean code Kiro generated saved 2 weeks of refactoring.
- Bad approach: Code first, document later (if ever)
- Good approach: Spec first, code second
2. Steering Docs = 1 % Effort, 99 % Payoff
Defining style and framework preferences once lets Kiro produce code that matches your ecosystem out of the box.