I Built a RAG Search Engine from Scratch to Understand How Modern Search Actually Works

Published: (February 25, 2026 at 11:16 PM EST)
2 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Overview

Everyone is building RAG apps, but most tutorials skip the most important part — search quality.
Instead of just plugging in a framework, I built my own RAG Search Engine from scratch to deeply understand how retrieval systems work under the hood.

You can watch the full breakdown here:

  • YouTube Video:
  • Source Code:

Retrieval Techniques Implemented

  • Term Frequency (TF)
  • Inverse Document Frequency (IDF)
  • BM25 scoring

These techniques illustrate why traditional keyword search remains extremely powerful in production systems.

Dense Semantic Retrieval

  • Embedding‑based representations
  • Cosine similarity for meaning‑based matching

Enables handling of:

  • Synonyms
  • Contextual variations
  • Conceptual similarity

Hybrid Ranking

Combined keyword and semantic signals using:

  • Weighted fusion
  • Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF)

This mirrors modern production search systems that blend precision with semantic understanding.

Reranking Stage

After retrieving the top results, a reranking model evaluates query‑document pairs more deeply, significantly improving relevance and precision.

Evaluation Metrics

  • Precision
  • Recall
  • F1 Score
  • Manual evaluation
  • LLM‑as‑a‑judge evaluation

These metrics provide a comprehensive view of retrieval performance.

Multimodal Retrieval

Experimented with text + image retrieval using embedding‑based similarity, extending the engine beyond pure text search.

Integration with LLM (RAG)

Connected the hybrid retrieval system to a large language model to generate grounded responses.
Key takeaway: Better retrieval > Bigger model.

Lessons Learned

  • Retrieval quality is the hardest and most critical part of RAG pipelines.
  • Hybrid systems consistently outperform pure keyword or pure semantic approaches.
  • Reranking adds a substantial boost to precision.
  • Proper evaluation (both quantitative metrics and qualitative judgment) is essential for trustworthy results.
  • Designing search systems involves trade‑offs between latency, index size, and relevance.

Topics of Interest

If you’re interested in any of the following, let’s discuss:

  • Search engines
  • Information retrieval
  • RAG systems
  • AI system design
  • Hybrid search architectures

I’d love to hear your thoughts—what would you improve or explore next? 👇

0 views
Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »