How to Prepare for Q1 Performance Reviews Right Now

Published: (December 17, 2025 at 03:22 PM EST)
6 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Why This Month Matters Most

Your brain isn’t built to retain a year of work. It’s optimized for the next problem, not the last one. This is fine for day‑to‑day engineering, but it’s terrible for career documentation.

Timeline

  • This week: Memories are sharp, context is fresh, you remember why decisions mattered.
  • January: Holiday reset means you’re mentally refreshed, but details are already fading.
  • March: Review season arrives and you’re scrambling, remembering maybe 40 % of what you did.

A timeline graphic showing how memory fades over time, comparing December with full recall, January with partial recall, and March with low recall. It emphasizes the importance of documenting information early while details are still fresh.

The difference between a great performance review and a mediocre one often comes down to this: did you document your work when memory was strong, or did you wait until memory was weak? Understanding what managers actually look for makes this even clearer.

What to Capture Right Now

Don’t try to write perfect achievement statements yet. Just capture the raw material while it’s fresh—you can refine later.

Major projects shipped

List every significant feature, system, or change you shipped in 2025. For each one, note:

  • What problem you were solving
  • Your specific role
  • Who else was involved
  • When it shipped

Metrics and quantifiable impact

  • Query‑latency improvements
  • Test‑coverage increases
  • Deployment‑time reductions
  • Infrastructure‑cost savings
  • Support‑ticket reductions
  • Incident‑frequency decreases

Numbers are powerful. Capture them now before they’re lost. This is why automated brag docs save so much time—they capture metrics automatically.

Challenges overcome

  • What was genuinely difficult?
  • What did you learn?

Examples: “Debugged a race condition that took three days to track down” and “Led a contentious technical decision where teams disagreed.”

Code reviews and mentoring

If you spent significant time reviewing code or helping teammates, capture that. This is one of the six types of developer impact that often gets overlooked. Don’t just say “did code reviews.” Get specific: “Reviewed 150+ PRs this year” or “Mentored two junior developers through their first major features.”

Reliability and incident response

If you participated in on‑call rotations, debugged production issues, or improved system reliability, document it with specifics.

Cross‑team collaboration

Did you work with product, design, sales, or other engineering teams? Document the context and your role.

Where to Find This Information

You’re not starting from scratch. Your work already exists in multiple places.

  • Git history and pull requests: Primary source of truth. Find the main PRs for each major project, note merge dates, capture commit‑message summaries, and check PR discussions for context about decisions and challenges.
  • Issue‑tracking system: Issues capture the problem statement, acceptance criteria, and decision‑making. Search for issues you reported or worked on.
  • Slack and email: Look for praise or feedback from teammates, questions where you provided key answers, discussions about decisions you influenced, and project announcements you were part of.
  • 1‑on‑1 notes: Often contain feedback about your growth, challenges you’re working on, and goals you hit.
  • Your calendar: Look at tech talks or training you gave, architecture‑decision meetings, project kickoffs, and presentations.

How to Structure Your Self‑Review

Once you’ve gathered your raw material, organize it by impact category rather than chronologically:

  1. Code & Features: Products and features you shipped
  2. Reliability & Debugging: Critical issues resolved, production incidents handled
  3. Technical Leadership: Architecture decisions, system design, technical direction
  4. Mentoring & Knowledge Sharing: Code reviews, onboarding, documentation, people you helped grow
  5. Process & Infrastructure: Build improvements, testing frameworks, dev tools
  6. Cross‑Functional Collaboration: Work with product, design, sales, or leadership

This structure helps your manager understand the full scope of your contributions. Most developers focus only on features, accidentally underselling other valuable work.

Writing Achievement Statements

For each achievement, follow this pattern:

  • Problem/Context: What was the situation?
  • Your Action: What specifically did you do?
  • Measurable Impact: What changed as a result?
  • Broader Significance: How does this affect the team, product, or company?

Use the raw material you captured, then refine each statement into a concise, impact‑focused bullet.

Significance: Why did it matter?

Example

Instead of: “Fixed performance issues in the API.”

Write: “Identified and resolved N+1 query problems in the user‑dashboard API. Reduced response times from 2.3 seconds to 340 ms through query optimization and connection pooling. This improved user‑experience metrics by 15 % and reduced infrastructure costs by $8 K annually.”

A comparison graphic between vague and specific achievement statements, highlighting how clear metrics and impact make accomplishments more meaningful. It also shows a simple four‑step framework: problem, action, impact, and significance.

See? It’s not flowery. It’s concrete, specific, and credible.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Being too vague. “Improved system reliability” sounds good but tells nobody what you actually did.
  • Underselling non‑code contributions. Mentoring, process improvements, and reliability work are invisible unless you document them. Senior developers are senior because they create leverage, not just because they write more code.
  • Forgetting to quantify. “Mentored three junior engineers through complete features, averaging 4‑5 hours per week of code reviews and pair programming” is much stronger than “mentored team members.”
  • Only preparing positives. Managers know you’re not perfect. Balanced reviews are more credible than flawless ones. Understanding what managers look for helps you strike the right balance.

Your Action Plan

This week

  • Spend 30 minutes listing major projects and accomplishments. Pull your GitHub history, Jira tickets, and Slack threads. Capture the raw material while it’s fresh.

Before the holidays

  • Write 5‑10 achievement statements using the pattern above. Organize them by impact category.

When you return

  • You’ll have a solid foundation ready. The hard work—capturing memories while they’re strong—will be done. Refine the statements during Q1 before reviews actually happen.

Automate the Boring Part

If you’re documenting achievements from Git history, you can automate this. The BragDoc CLI automatically extracts achievements from your commits and pull requests. Run it once before the holidays, review what it captured, and you’ll have saved hours of manual digging.

The automation handles the busy work. You handle the context, the metrics, and the significance.

The Compounding Effect

Documentation compounds.

  • Year 2025: Document now → you have a complete record.
  • Year 2026: Add to the already‑solid documentation.
  • Year 2027: Three years of clear achievement records.

Conversely, if you skip documenting 2025, you’ll be scrambling to remember both 2025 and 2026 when 2026 ends. Every year without documentation makes the problem worse.

Start the habit now. It pays dividends for your entire career. Learn more about why developers need automated brag docs to make this sustainable.

Start Today

  1. Pick three major projects you shipped in 2025.
  2. For each project, jot down:
    • What you built
    • When it shipped
    • Measurable impact
    • Who benefited

That’s your starting point.

By the time Q1 reviews arrive, you’ll be prepared instead of scrambling. Your work speaks for itself—but only if you document it. Ready to get started?

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »