Frontend System Design: Redux Toolkit vs Zustand vs Jotai

Published: (December 20, 2025 at 09:25 PM EST)
2 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Why this comparison matters

As your React app grows, local state quickly becomes insufficient. You start dealing with:

  • Shared data across screens
  • Async API calls
  • Caching
  • Global UI state
  • Predictable debugging

High‑level mental models

LibraryMental model
Redux ToolkitCentralized enterprise‑grade data system
ZustandSimple global store accessed via hooks
JotaiAtomic state pieces wired together

Architecture diagrams

flowchart TB
  UI -->|dispatch| Store
  Store --> Reducers
  Reducers --> Store
  Store -->|select| UI
flowchart TB
  UI --> Store
  Store --> UI
flowchart TB
  UI --> Atom1
  UI --> Atom2
  Atom1 --> Atom3

Redux Toolkit

Redux Toolkit is the official, opinionated way to use Redux. It enforces:

  • Single source of truth
  • Immutable updates
  • One‑way data flow
  • Predictability
import { createSlice } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';

const usersSlice = createSlice({
  name: 'users',
  initialState: [],
  reducers: {
    setUsers: (state, action) => action.payload,
  },
});

Pros

  • ✅ Best for large teams
  • ✅ Powerful debugging with Redux DevTools

Cons

  • ❌ More boilerplate than alternatives

Zustand

Zustand is a minimal global‑state library built on hooks. No reducers are required.

import create from 'zustand';

const useUserStore = create(set => ({
  users: [],
  setUsers: users => set({ users }),
}));

Pros

  • ✅ Extremely simple API
  • ✅ Very low boilerplate

Cons

  • ❌ No enforced structure, which can lead to inconsistency in larger codebases

Jotai

Jotai is based on atomic state. Each piece of state is independent and composable.

import { atom } from 'jotai';

const usersAtom = atom([]);
const filteredUsersAtom = atom(get =>
  get(usersAtom).filter(u => u.active)
);

Pros

  • ✅ Fine‑grained re‑renders (atom‑level reactivity)
  • ✅ Great for highly reactive UI

Cons

  • ❌ Mental model can be harder to grasp for newcomers

Side‑by‑side feature comparison

FeatureRedux ToolkitZustandJotai
BoilerplateMediumVery LowLow
Mental modelReducers & ActionsHook‑based storeAtomic state
Debugging⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Async supportExcellentManualManual
Scalability⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Learning curveMediumLowMedium
Best forEnterprise appsSmall–mid appsComplex UI state

Re‑render strategies

LibraryStrategy
Redux ToolkitSelector‑based
ZustandSubscription‑based
JotaiAtom‑level reactivity

Takeaways

  • Jotai offers the most granular updates.
  • Redux Toolkit provides the strongest predictability guarantees.
  • Zustand is the simplest to adopt.

When to choose which library

ScenarioRecommended library
Enterprise dashboard (100+ screens, multiple teams)Redux Toolkit
Admin panel (small‑to‑mid size, fast iteration)Zustand
Design tools / UI‑heavy apps (heavy derived state, performance‑critical)Jotai
E‑commerce platform (large, long‑living)Redux Toolkit
Side projects / prototypesZustand

Decision guide

  • App size – Larger, long‑living apps benefit from Redux Toolkit’s structure.
  • Team size – Bigger teams need strong conventions (Redux) or clear boundaries (Zustand).
  • Complex UI state – Choose Jotai for fine‑grained reactivity.
  • Speed & simplicity – Zustand shines for rapid development.

Real‑world use‑case mapping

Use caseLibraryReason
Global authentication stateRedux ToolkitCentralized, easy debugging
Theme toggling across the appZustandSimple hook‑based store
Interactive canvas with many independent objectsJotaiAtom‑level updates avoid unnecessary renders

Interview‑ready summary

  • Redux Toolkit: Best for enterprise‑scale apps, offers devtools and strong conventions, but adds boilerplate.
  • Zustand: Minimal API, great for small to medium projects, no enforced patterns.
  • Jotai: Atomic state, ideal for UI‑heavy scenarios where performance matters, requires a different mental model.

Further reading

  • System design articles: systemdesignwithzeeshanali
  • Source code:
Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »