Forget ‘TechnoKing’: Elon Musk will really be king at SpaceX
Source: TechCrunch
Elon Musk’s Dominance Over SpaceX
Elon Musk wields extraordinary control over the companies he leads. While he already brands himself “TechnoKing” at Tesla, his grip on SpaceX is even more absolute, giving him unprecedented authority over one of the world’s most valuable enterprises.
Key Points from the IPO Filing
- Roles after IPO: Musk will serve as CEO, CTO, and Chairman of the Board.
- Voting power: He will hold more than 50 % of the voting rights, allowing him to appoint directors at will and making it virtually impossible to remove him.
- Shareholder restrictions: The filing imposes limits on how shareholders can bring legal challenges.
- Regulatory environment: SpaceX will benefit from Texas’s permissive regulatory regime—a landscape Musk helped shape when he moved Tesla’s incorporation from Delaware to Texas.
“This will limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters and the election of our directors.”
— SpaceX prospectus, IPO filing
Source
- The company’s IPO filing, made public on Wednesday: TechCrunch article (May 20 2026)
The above summary highlights the monarchical structure Musk will retain at SpaceX following its public offering.
More Control Than Mark
Tech founders have enjoyed increased control over public companies over the last two decades, especially as Google, Meta (then Facebook), and other tech firms went public with dual‑class shares.
But Elon Musk and SpaceX are taking things much further, according to Ann Lipton, professor of law at the University of Colorado.
Lipton argued, in a blog post published last Friday, that Musk is obliterating the three most powerful levers shareholders can typically pull to pressure a public company’s top executive.
1. Voting Power
- Dual‑class structure: SpaceX’s Class B super‑voting shares give Musk 93.6 % of the voting power. These shares will not be offered to the public.
- Post‑IPO control: Even if SpaceX becomes the largest IPO in history, Musk will retain more than 50 % of the voting power, classifying SpaceX as a controlled company under stock‑exchange rules. Controlled companies may exempt themselves from certain independent‑oversight requirements.
- Shareholder protections: SpaceX’s IPO filing states that regular shareholders (who will own Class A shares) “will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate‑governance requirements of Nasdaq.”
Because Musk controls the vote, he can unilaterally approve actions that normally require shareholder consent—e.g., mergers and acquisitions. If he ever decides to merge SpaceX with Tesla (a scenario many have speculated about), he would not need to convince SpaceX shareholders.
2. Comparison with Tesla
- Musk’s voting stake at Tesla: ~20 %
- Result: Musk must exert considerable pressure on Tesla’s board and shareholders to secure favorable outcomes.
- Recent example: In 2023, Musk threatened to leave Tesla unless he received a larger compensation package. Shareholders eventually approved a $1 trillion compensation plan.
Takeaway
Musk’s near‑total voting control at SpaceX gives him a level of authority far beyond what he enjoys at Tesla, fundamentally altering the balance of power between the company’s leadership and its shareholders.
A Legal Shield
SpaceX is tightening the ability to sue by leveraging its Texas incorporation.
-
Derivative‑suit threshold – Shareholders can bring a derivative suit only if they own ≥ 3 % of the company’s shares.
- At a projected $1.75 trillion valuation, that translates to roughly $52 billion in stock.
-
What is a derivative suit?
It’s a lawsuit filed by shareholders on the company’s behalf against its directors.
Example: A small shareholder sued Tesla’s board over the $56 billion pay package awarded to Elon Musk in 2018. -
Bylaw provisions – SpaceX’s bylaws direct most lawsuits to:
- The Texas Business Court (operational since 2024), or
- Mandatory arbitration.
“Forget it, that’s it. There isn’t going to be a lawsuit,” Lipton told TechCrunch.
Context
- This protective framework did not exist before Musk moved Tesla (and now SpaceX) from Delaware to Texas.
- According to Lipton, Delaware courts were increasingly scrutinizing companies with structures like SpaceX’s:
- Dual‑class shares grant outsized voting power, but also invite greater oversight from Delaware’s judicial system.
In short, SpaceX’s Texas incorporation creates a formidable legal shield that makes shareholder litigation far more difficult.
Vote with Your Feet
SpaceX has altered the final lever of shareholder power—selling shares and walking away—according to Lip‑Lipton.
What changed?
- Nasdaq index rules – SpaceX successfully lobbied Nasdaq to relax the timeline for adding companies to the Nasdaq‑100 (a basket of large‑cap, “fundamentally sound and innovative” firms).
- Speed of inclusion – What once took months can now happen in weeks.
Why it matters
When a company is added to an index such as the Nasdaq‑100 or S&P 500, it becomes an automatic buy for many large institutional investors (e.g., 401(k) providers).
- Early‑stage price boost – Lip‑Lipton argues that the impending inclusion will buoy SpaceX’s stock price in the first days of public trading, as traders rush to buy before institutions pile in and push the price even higher.
- Reduced “sell‑to‑punish” power –
“Normally, if you can’t vote, and you can’t sue, you can at least sell and drive down the price, and that hurts,” Lip‑Lipton said. “It hurts the controller of the company, it hurts executives who are paid in stock. But now even that is being manipulated.”
Expert perspective
Chan Ahn, former Goldman Sachs/JPMorgan executive and current CEO of tokenized‑private‑equity firm Tessera, agrees that rapid Nasdaq‑100 inclusion could lift the price. However, he notes that shareholders still retain the ability to “vote with their feet.”
“You don’t have to buy, and if you have it, and if you don’t like it, you can sell,” Ahn told TechCrunch.
In short, while the traditional “sell‑to‑punish” lever is still technically available, the accelerated index inclusion may blunt its impact on SpaceX’s share price.
All the Money
On top of this control, Musk stands to make a historically anomalous amount of money from SpaceX going forward.
Not only will the IPO likely make him the world’s first trillionaire, he was granted a compensation package consisting of 1 billion Class B shares.
Those shares don’t vest until Musk makes the company worth $7.5 trillion and, crucially, accomplishes the “establishment of a permanent human colony on Mars with at least one million inhabitants.”
While the “Mars colony” requirement may make the package seem unobtainable to many, Musk can still extract a ton of value from these shares long before SpaceX ever reaches the red planet.
- In the stock‑award agreement attached to the IPO filing, SpaceX reveals that Musk can vote with these shares even before they vest.
- He can also pledge them as collateral for loans. This is a common move for the ultra‑rich to access cash without being taxed on unrealized gains, and Musk has done it before with his SpaceX and Tesla holdings.
Although borrowing against these Mars‑colony shares technically requires board approval, Musk controls the board, so the decision ultimately rests with him.
These incredibly valuable shares become normal common stock if and when Musk sells them.
Exception: Musk can place the shares in trusts to retain their super‑voting status, meaning the “king of SpaceX” – who has at least 14 known children – may be positioning himself for dynastic control.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.