Debounce in Swift: Ditch Combine for This One Simple Loop

Published: (January 19, 2026 at 10:22 PM EST)
6 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

Enter Swift Async Algorithms – Apple’s answer to making async operations feel as natural as a for loop

What is Swift Async Algorithms?

Swift Async Algorithms is Apple’s open‑source library that brings familiar collection algorithms to the world of async sequences. Think of it as the missing standard‑library support for async/await – it provides tools like debounce, throttle, merge, combineLatest, and more, but designed from the ground up for Swift’s modern concurrency model.

  • Released in 2022, it’s Apple’s way of saying: “You don’t need Combine for everything anymore.”
  • One‑line summary: It’s like the Combine framework, but built for async/await instead of publishers and subscribers.

Why Should You Care?

Imagine you’re building a search bar. Every time the user types, you want to query an API, but you don’t want to spam it with requests. You need debouncing.

The old way (Combine)The new way (Async Algorithms)
Import a whole frameworkUse native Swift concurrency
Deal with publishers, subscribers, and cancellablesWrite code that reads like English
Store subscription lifecyclesNo subscription management
Convert between async and publisher worldsWorks seamlessly with async/await

If you’re already using async/await in your app, why add Combine just for one operator?

Real‑World Example: Search‑Bar Debounce

Below are the same feature implemented with both approaches. The contrast should make the benefits of Async Algorithms crystal clear.

The Combine Way

import Combine
import UIKit

class CombineSearchViewController: UIViewController {
    @IBOutlet weak var searchBar: UISearchBar!
    @IBOutlet weak var tableView: UITableView!

    private var cancellables = Set()
    private let searchSubject = PassthroughSubject<String, Never>()
    private var results: [String] = []

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        setupSearch()
    }

    private func setupSearch() {
        // Set up the debounce pipeline
        searchSubject
            .debounce(for: .milliseconds(500), scheduler: DispatchQueue.main)
            .removeDuplicates()
            .sink { [weak self] query in
                Task {
                    await self?.performSearch(query: query)
                }
            }
            .store(in: &cancellables)

        searchBar.delegate = self
    }

    private func performSearch(query: String) async {
        // Simulate API call
        try? await Task.sleep(nanoseconds: 500_000_000)

        let mockResults = [
            "Result for \(query) - 1",
            "Result for \(query) - 2",
            "Result for \(query) - 3"
        ]

        await MainActor.run {
            self.results = mockResults
            self.tableView.reloadData()
        }
    }
}

extension CombineSearchViewController: UISearchBarDelegate {
    func searchBar(_ searchBar: UISearchBar, textDidChange searchText: String) {
        searchSubject.send(searchText)
    }
}

What’s happening

  • A PassthroughSubject emits search‑text values.
  • Operators are chained: debounce → removeDuplicates → sink.
  • Inside sink we bridge to async with Task.
  • We must manage a Set for cleanup.
  • Two concurrency models (Combine + async/await) coexist.

The Async Algorithms Way

import AsyncAlgorithms
import UIKit

class AsyncSearchViewController: UIViewController {
    @IBOutlet weak var searchBar: UISearchBar!
    @IBOutlet weak var tableView: UITableView!

    private let searchStream = AsyncChannel<String>()
    private var results: [String] = []

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        searchBar.delegate = self

        Task {
            await observeSearches()
        }
    }

    private func observeSearches() async {
        // This reads like plain English!
        for await query in searchStream
            .debounce(for: .milliseconds(500))
            .removeDuplicates() {
                await performSearch(query: query)
        }
    }

    private func performSearch(query: String) async {
        // Simulate API call
        try? await Task.sleep(nanoseconds: 500_000_000)

        let mockResults = [
            "Result for \(query) - 1",
            "Result for \(query) - 2",
            "Result for \(query) - 3"
        ]

        await MainActor.run {
            self.results = mockResults
            self.tableView.reloadData()
        }
    }
}

extension AsyncSearchViewController: UISearchBarDelegate {
    func searchBar(_ searchBar: UISearchBar, textDidChange searchText: String) {
        Task {
            await searchStream.send(searchText)
        }
    }
}

Why this feels night‑and‑day

  • AsyncChannel acts as an async stream you can send into.
  • A single for await loop consumes debounced, deduplicated values.
  • All code stays in the async/await world – no bridging required.
  • No cancellables, no extra lifecycle management.

Breaking Down the Async Algorithms Approach

The magic line:

for await query in searchStream
    .debounce(for: .milliseconds(500))
    .removeDuplicates() {
        await performSearch(query: query)
}

What’s happening?

ComponentDescription
AsyncChannelA sendable async sequence. Think of it as a pipeline where you push values on one end and pull them on the other.
.debounce(for: .milliseconds(500))Waits for 500 ms of “quiet time” before emitting the latest value. If a new value arrives before the timer fires, the timer resets.
.removeDuplicates()Suppresses consecutive identical queries, preventing unnecessary API calls.
for awaitConsumes the async sequence element‑by‑element, just like a regular for‑in loop.
await performSearch(query:)Calls the async search function directly—no Task {} wrapper needed.

All of this runs on the Swift concurrency runtime, giving you deterministic cancellation, structured concurrency, and a syntax that reads like prose.

TL;DR

  • Swift Async Algorithms provides collection‑style operators (debounce, throttle, merge, …) for async sequences.
  • It lets you replace Combine‑style pipelines with clean async/await code.
  • No extra framework, no cancellables, no bridging—just native Swift concurrency.

Give it a try the next time you need debouncing, throttling, or any other stream‑processing logic in an async‑first codebase. Your future self (and your reviewers) will thank you.

Debounce – Emit the latest value after a pause in the stream:

for await value in stream.debounce(for: .seconds(0.5), clock: .continuous) {
    print(value)          // Fires only after the user stops typing for 0.5 s
}

If the user keeps typing during that window, the timer resets.

.removeDuplicates()

Filters out consecutive identical values.
If the user types “cat”, deletes it, then types “cat” again, the search runs only once.

for await

The loop suspends at each iteration, waiting for the next value.
Clean, sequential, and readable.

Installation

Add Swift Async Algorithms to your project via Swift Package Manager:

https://github.com/apple/swift-async-algorithms

In Xcode: File → Add Package Dependencies → paste the URL above.

When to Use Which?

Use Async Algorithms when:

  • You’re already using async/await
  • Building new features from scratch
  • You want simpler, more readable code
  • Your team is comfortable with modern Swift concurrency

Use Combine when:

  • Working with legacy code that already uses Combine
  • You need tight SwiftUI integration (Combine still has the edge here)
  • Building complex reactive pipelines with many operators
  • Targeting iOS versions before async/await

The Memory Trick

  • Combine = publishers push values → you subscribe and react
  • Async Algorithms = you pull values → you await and process

One More Thing: Other Cool Operators

Throttle – Emit at most one value per time window

for await value in stream.throttle(for: .seconds(1), clock: .continuous) {
    print(value)
}

Merge – Combine multiple async sequences

for await value in merge(streamA, streamB) {
    print(value)
}

Zip – Combine values from multiple sequences pairwise

for await (a, b) in zip(streamA, streamB) {
    print("Pair: \(a), \(b)")
}

CombineLatest – Get the latest from multiple streams

for await (a, b) in combineLatest(streamA, streamB) {
    print("Latest: \(a), \(b)")
}

The Bottom Line

Swift Async Algorithms isn’t replacing Combine – it’s giving you a choice.
If you’ve gone all‑in on async/await (and you should), then Async Algorithms is the natural next step.

The search‑bar example shows it perfectly: what required multiple objects, subscriptions, and mental gymnastics in Combine becomes a single readable for await loop.

Next time you reach for Combine just to debounce a text field, try Async Algorithms instead.

Want to dive deeper?

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »

SC #11: Task Groups

TaskGroup Un TaskGroup contiene subtareas creadas dinámicamente, que pueden ejecutarse de forma serial o concurrente. El grupo solo se considera terminado cuan...

SC #8: Cancelando un Task

Cancelación de Task en Swift y SwiftUI > Nota: En Swift, cancelar una Task no garantiza que la ejecución se detenga inmediatamente. Cada Task debe comprobar ma...

Approachable Swift Concurrency

Article URL: https://fuckingapproachableswiftconcurrency.com/en/ Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46432916 Points: 11 Comments: 0...

SC #10: Tarea desacoplada

Una tarea desacoplada Detached Task ejecuta una operación de forma asíncrona, fuera del contexto de concurrencia estructurado que la envuelve. No heredar este c...