Cipher Maps: When Category Theory Meets Oblivious Computing
Source: Dev.to
Introduction
What if we could compute on encrypted data while preserving algebraic structure?
Not through expensive homomorphic encryption, but via a principled mathematical framework that unifies:
- Oblivious computing
- Bernoulli types (statistical approximation)
- Categorical abstractions
My recent work on cipher maps and algebraic cipher types explores exactly this idea.
Core Idea: Cipher Functors
A cipher functor cA lifts a monoid
[ (S,\ *,\ e) ]
into a cipher monoid
[ (cA(S),\ \oplus,\ \hat e) ]
Latent space (real monoid) : (S, *, e)
↓ cA (cipher functor)
Cipher space (encrypted) : (cA(S), ⊕, ê)
Key Properties
| Property | Description |
|---|---|
| Structure preservation | cA(x * y) ≈ cA(x) ⊕ cA(y) (up to a controlled approximation) |
| Privacy | Operations on ciphertexts reveal nothing about the underlying values |
| Composability | Composition of cipher operations mirrors composition in the base monoid |
| Approximation | Results are approximate but come with provable error bounds |
These properties give us a type system for oblivious computing: instead of ad‑hoc encryption schemes, we obtain principled constructions that preserve algebraic structure.
Why This Matters
- Formal privacy guarantees are baked into the type.
- Error bounds are derived from Bernoulli‑type theory.
- Composable abstractions let us build complex oblivious pipelines from verified components.
Illustrative Examples
| Base monoid | Cipher lift | Resulting oblivious structure |
|---|---|---|
| ((\mathbb{N}, +, 0)) | cA | Oblivious counters |
| ((\mathcal{P}(U), \cup, \varnothing)) | cA | Hash‑based oblivious sets (Bloom‑filter‑like) |
| ((\mathbb{N}^U, \oplus, \mathbf{0})) | cA | Count‑Min sketches with privacy |
(Links: Algebraic Cipher Types, Cipher Maps)
Unified Framework
The paper unifies three major threads:
- Algebraic cipher types – categorical foundations
- Bernoulli types – statistical approximation theory
- Oblivious function approximation – practical algorithms
Cipher Maps as Morphisms
- Objects – cipher types (encrypted/oblivious data structures)
- Morphisms – functions that preserve both algebraic structure and statistical properties
Composition of morphisms yields principled ways to build complex oblivious computations while tracking error propagation.
Key Contribution: Oblivious Bernoulli Maps
An Oblivious Bernoulli map is a function
[ f : cA(S) \to cA(T) ]
that:
- Operates on encrypted/oblivious inputs
- Produces encrypted/oblivious outputs
- Has provable error bounds (from Bernoulli‑type theory)
- Preserves categorical structure (from cipher functors)
Practical Result
- Start with a regular function
f : S → T. - Lift it to a cipher map
cA(f) : cA(S) → cA(T). - Obtain automatic privacy guarantees and formal error bounds.
- Compose multiple cipher maps while tracking error propagation.
Why the Abstract Mathematics?
| Category‑theoretic notion | Benefit for oblivious computing |
|---|---|
Functoriality cA(f ∘ g) = cA(f) ∘ cA(g) | Secure composition is free |
| Natural transformations | Generic conversion between oblivious representations |
| Limits / colimits | Systematic construction of compound oblivious types |
| Monoidal structure | Parallel composition of oblivious computations |
Without these abstractions, each new oblivious algorithm would require a bespoke security proof.
Concrete Instantiation: Cipher‑Trapdoor‑Sets
The cipher‑trapdoor‑sets paper presents a concrete example:
- Base monoid – powerset ((\mathcal{P}(U), \cup, \varnothing))
- Cipher functor – hash‑based Bernoulli maps
Result: Hash‑Based Oblivious Sets (HBOS), i.e., Bloom filters equipped with:
- Formal privacy semantics
- Compositional error bounds
- Type‑safe set operations (union, intersection, etc.)
Applications in the Wild
- Database operators – join, project, select on oblivious data (hiding access patterns)
- Aggregation queries –
SUM,COUNT,AVGlifted to appropriate monoids - Gradient aggregation – oblivious types enable differential privacy without a trusted aggregator
- Streaming analytics – cipher maps over streaming monoids give constant‑memory, provably private pipelines
Implementation Sketch (C++)
// Pseudocode sketch
template <typename T>
class CipherFunctor {
public:
using Cipher = ObliviousBernoulli;
// Lift a clear value into the cipher domain
Cipher lift(const T& value);
// Approximate inverse (decrypt/approximate)
T approximate_inverse(const Cipher& cipher) const;
// Monoidal operation on ciphertexts
Cipher combine(const Cipher& a, const Cipher& b) const;
};
Implemented with modern template metaprogramming, the design aims for a zero‑cost abstraction.
Research Directions
| Direction | Open Questions |
|---|---|
| Higher categories | Functors between cipher categories? |
| Dependent types | Encode privacy/accuracy trade‑offs in the type system? |
| Effect systems | Track information flow using cipher maps? |
| Compiler integration | Automatically lift regular code to oblivious versions? |
Outlook
We are at an inflection point:
- Privacy regulations demand oblivious computing.
- Scale pushes us toward approximate algorithms.
- Complexity calls for compositional abstractions.
Cipher maps provide the mathematical foundation to build these systems correctly—turning “ad‑hoc crypto + hope” into principled constructions, automatic privacy, and compositional security.
Related Papers
- Algebraic Cipher Types
- Cipher Maps: Unified Framework
- Hash‑Based Oblivious Sets
- Bernoulli Types Series
- Encrypted Search with Oblivious Types
(All links to be added.)
Privacy‑preserving systems with formal guarantees