Cellebrite cut off Serbia citing abuse of its phone unlocking tools. Why not others?

Published: (February 19, 2026 at 05:04 PM EST)
4 min read
Source: TechCrunch

Source: TechCrunch

Last year, the phone‑hacking tool maker Cellebrite announced it had suspended Serbian police as customers after human‑rights researchers alleged local police and intelligence agencies used its tools to hack the phones of a journalist and an activist, and to plant spyware.

This was a rare example of Cellebrite publicly cutting off a customer following documented abuse allegations, citing Amnesty International’s technical report for its decision.

“Amnesty International’s technical report”link


Recent accusations in Jordan and Kenya

Despite similar accusations of abuse in Jordan and Kenya, the Israeli‑headquartered company has dismissed the allegations and declined to commit to investigating them, a shift from its earlier approach.

Both investigations relied on traces of a specific application linked to Cellebrite found on the victims’ phones. The researchers described these traces as a “high confidence” indicator that Cellebrite’s unlocking tools had been used, noting that the same application had previously appeared on VirusTotal (a malware repository) and was signed with digital certificates owned by Cellebrite.

“We do not respond to speculation and encourage any organization with specific, evidence‑based concerns to share them with us directly so we can act on them,” Victor Cooper, spokesperson for Cellebrite, told TechCrunch.

When asked why Cellebrite is acting differently from the Serbia case, Cooper said the two situations are “incomparable” and that “high confidence is not direct evidence.” He did not respond to follow‑up questions about whether Cellebrite would investigate the Citizen Lab’s latest report or how its approach differs from the Serbian case.


Contact Us

Do you have more information about Cellebrite or similar companies?
You can contact Lorenzo Franceschi‑Bicchierai securely from a non‑work device:


Cellebrite’s response to the investigations

  • Jordan report: Cellebrite replied that “any substantiated use of our tools in violation of human rights or local law will result in immediate disablement,” but it did not commit to investigating the case nor disclosed specific customer information.

  • Kenya report: Cellebrite acknowledged receipt of Citizen Lab’s inquiry but did not comment, according to researcher John Scott‑Railton.

“We urge Cellebrite to release the specific criteria they used to approve sales to Kenyan authorities, and disclose how many licenses have been revoked in the past,” Scott‑Railton told TechCrunch. “If Cellebrite is serious about their rigorous vetting, they should have no problem making it public.”


Past instances of Cellebrite cutting off customers

Cellebrite claims to have more than 7,000 law‑enforcement customers worldwide. It has previously halted relationships with several regimes after abuse reports:

Country/RegionYearReason
Bangladesh2021Human‑rights concerns
Myanmar2021Military surveillance abuse
Russia & Belarus2021After investigative reporting
Hong Kong & China2021U.S. export‑control restrictions
OtherVarious human‑rights and compliance issues

Local activists in Hong Kong have accused authorities of using Cellebrite to unlock protest‑related devices.


This markdown has been cleaned for readability while preserving the original structure and content.

Lorenzo Franceschi‑Bicchierai is a Senior Writer at TechCrunch, where he covers hacking, cybersecurity, surveillance, and privacy.  

You can contact or verify outreach from Lorenzo by emailing [lorenzo@techcrunch.com](mailto:lorenzo@techcrunch.com), via encrypted message at **+1 917 257 1382** on Signal, and **@lorenzofb** on Keybase/Telegram.  

[View Bio](https://techcrunch.com/author/lorenzo-franceschi-bicchierai/)

---

*ters’ phones.*
0 views
Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »