Blazor SaaS Starter Kits Compared: When to Choose Brick Starter for Full‑Stack C#

Source: Dev.to

Why Blazor SaaS starter kits exist

Blazor lets developers build rich web UIs in C# instead of JavaScript, which is attractive to .NET teams who want full‑stack C# across client and server. However, building a serious SaaS app still demands multi‑tenant architecture, authentication, billing, localization, admin tools, and deployment plumbing—far beyond what “File → New Blazor App” provides.

Blazor‑focused SaaS starter kits exist to package those repetitive capabilities into reusable templates, so teams can start from a running Blazor + ASP.NET Core SaaS skeleton instead of reinventing every infrastructure piece.

Types of Blazor SaaS starter kits

Most Blazor SaaS kits fall into three broad types.

• Blazor UI‑first templates – focus on page layouts, components, and auth for single‑tenant apps; ideal for internal tools and basic CRUD but light on multi‑tenancy and billing.
• Blazor‑centric multi‑tenant kits – add tenant awareness, localization, and better authorization on top of Blazor, often with opinionated architectures like Clean Architecture.
• Full SaaS boilerplates – combine Blazor (optionally among other UIs) with a mature .NET backend that includes tenant management, recurring payments, MFA, email templates, background jobs, and more.

Brick Starter fits into the third category, where the goal is to ship production SaaS, not just a nice Blazor front end.

Notable Blazor SaaS starter kits

• BlazorPlate – a multi‑tenant and multilingual Blazor template that targets SaaS scenarios with support for Blazor Server and WebAssembly, MudBlazor UI, authentication/authorization, and shared‑database multi‑tenancy.
• Clean Architecture‑style Blazor kits (samples and open templates) – focus on DDD, modularity, and clean layering with Blazor front ends, but often require you to add billing, tenant lifecycle, and operational features yourself.
• Custom Blazor SaaS templates on GitHub and marketplaces – many offer auth, basic roles, and Stripe integration, but coverage of admin, email, localization, and multi‑tenant configuration varies significantly.

These kits can be excellent for teams comfortable extending infrastructure, but they still expect you to fill gaps, especially around multi‑tenant billing and operations.

Brick Starter: full‑stack C# boilerplate with a Blazor option

Brick Starter is a .NET SaaS boilerplate that supports multiple front‑end stacks—including Blazor—on top of a single, feature‑rich ASP.NET Core backend. The same backend powers Blazor, Angular, React, Vue, Next.js, and Razor, so C# teams can stay in .NET on both client and server while choosing the best UI for each project.

Out of the box, Brick provides SaaS‑critical building blocks:

• Multi‑tenancy – tenant creation, isolation, subdomain‑based tenant routing, and a full tenant management panel.
• Authentication and authorization – email, social, and Entra ID sign‑in; role and permission framework; multi‑factor authentication via email OTP and authenticator apps.
• Billing and subscriptions – integrated Stripe‑based recurring payments with tenant‑level plans and automated handling of renewals, cancellations, and failures.
• Operational features – email template management, multi‑language UI, database data encryption, background jobs, and admin dashboards for users, tenants, and settings.

All of this ships with full source code so teams can extend patterns, integrate with their own services, and audit everything.

Blazor‑specific benefits in Brick Starter

When you choose the Blazor option in Brick Starter, you get a Blazor front end that is designed to sit on top of that SaaS‑ready backend rather than being a one‑off UI. That means your Blazor components immediately benefit from tenant context, permission checks, billing state, and localization that are already implemented server‑side.

Advantages for full‑stack C# teams

• Single language end‑to‑end – C# for Blazor components, business logic, and backend services, reducing context switching and making it easier to share models and validation.
• Consistent patterns across clients – if you later add a React or Angular client, they call the same APIs and reuse the same multi‑tenant logic, making Brick a long‑term foundation rather than a Blazor‑only experiment.
• Faster onboarding – Blazor and .NET developers can work within familiar patterns while leveraging Brick’s opinionated modules for security, tenants, and payments.

How Brick compares to other Blazor SaaS kits

For teams that want not just a UI template but a reusable SaaS platform, Brick’s broader scope and shared backend architecture are important differentiators.

When to choose Brick Starter for full‑stack C#

Brick Starter is usually the right Blazor SaaS kit when:

• You want full‑stack C# but do not want to design multi‑tenant, subscription, and security infrastructure yourself.
• You may need to support additional clients (SPA, mobile, or another JS framework) later, and you want a backend that is already built for that.
• You are a founder, product team, or agency that needs to standardize on a single .NET SaaS foundation across multiple apps, with predictable architecture and commercial support.

In those cases, Brick Starter’s combination of Blazor front end, multi‑tenant SaaS backend, and full source code makes it a strong choice among Blazor SaaS starter kits for 2026 and beyond.