Angular State Management: Signals vs Simple Properties - Which Should I Use?

Published: (January 11, 2026 at 06:55 AM EST)
1 min read
Source: Dev.to

Source: Dev.to

The Classic Approach: Simple Properties

export class UserComponent {
  userName: string = 'Mohamed';
  userAge: number = 24;

  updateName(newName: string) {
    this.userName = newName; // Simple assignment
  }
}

Pros

  • Straightforward, familiar, easy to understand

Cons

  • Change detection can be inefficient with large component trees

The New Kid: Signals (Angular 16+)

import { signal } from '@angular/core';

export class UserComponent {
  userName = signal('Mohamed');
  userAge = signal(24);

  updateName(newName: string) {
    this.userName.set(newName); // Signal update
  }
}

Pros

  • Fine‑grained reactivity
  • Better performance
  • Cleaner derived state

Cons

  • More verbose syntax
  • Learning curve for existing codebases

My Confusion (and Questions for You!)

Typical Scenarios

  • User authentication state (logged‑in user, token, permissions)
  • Real‑time notifications (WebSocket updates)
  • Form state (post creation, validation)

Questions for Experienced Angular Developers

  • Do you mix both approaches in the same project, or go all‑in on Signals?
  • Are Signals worth adopting for new projects in 2026?
  • What’s your rule of thumb for deciding which to use?

Questions for Those Migrating from Properties to Signals

  • Did you see real performance improvements?
  • Was the migration painful?

I’d love to hear your real‑world experiences and recommendations! Drop your thoughts in the comments.

Tags: angular webdev javascript typescript frontend discuss

Back to Blog

Related posts

Read more »

Angular Version 21 Upgrade Example

Overview This Angular web application was the first one I developed as a self‑directed study in 2020. It has been upgraded regularly since its Angular 8 incept...